• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Another shitty lobby demand became regulation just like that. Besides, protecting the label „burger“? Really? You know what I‘ll just call them sandwiches from now on. Fuck that.

  • saarth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    This stinks of (rotten) meat lobby.

    I hope the meat substitute industry comes up with some kind of ‘it’s not meat’ marketing campaign to counter this.

    • Eril@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      It worked for oat milk. I’m buying “no milk” all the time 😅

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      25 days ago

      I hope the meat substitute industry comes up with some kind of ‘it’s not meat’ marketing campaign to counter this.

      Well, honestly it would be fucking time they come out with some name that not mimic the meat products name.

  • CreativeCider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    25 days ago

    Fucking idiots. Almost nobody is able to decipher the ingredients including E numbers, but people are confused by “burger”

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s not like they can’t do several things at once. Small things add up.

      • germanichwurst@feddit.orgBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Bullshit. I’m not paying 50% taxes so a bunch of idiot can whine about “fake meat”.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          That’s not how it works. You don’t pay 50% taxes to have that.

          I understand you think it’s not something you’d like the EU to spend money on, but this whole “I pay loads of taxes For This?!” is just making the discussion become quite low level IMO.

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              I’m not, you are probably upset because I didn’t buy into your tankie crap or some other conspiracy theory 100%.

              You seem to be a very very angry person.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 days ago

    When will they ban the name of the Hungarian dessert “Bird Milk” for being made of cow milk, sugar, vanilla extract, and eggs, instead of milk from birds?

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    From the eu Parliament document: *3. ‘Meat products’ means processed products resulting from the processing of meat or from the further processing of such processed products, so that the cut surface shows that the product no longer has the characteristics of fresh meat. Names that fall under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 that are currently used for meat products and meat preparations shall be reserved exclusively for products containing meat.

    These names include, for example:

    • Steak
    • Escalope
    • Sausage
    • Burger
    • Hamburger
    • Egg yolk
    • Egg white*

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2025-0161_EN.html Use ctrl+f “burger” to find it in the text.

    This not only affects vegetarian food, but also salmon steak for example. It’s a populist political move that doesn’t seem to be backed up by any linguistic science, as if mystery sausages haven’t been a thing for centuries. As long as it looks like a sausage, it is a sausage imo. It’s also not law yet, the member states still have to approve those amendements.

    Ps, this gave me an idea for possible vegetarian branding: names like “not a burger” seem to still be allowed, so a line of foodstuffs called “not a sausage” etc might be fun.

  • treno_rosso@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Investing time and money into producing meat alternatives for the growing market share of vegans and vegetarians? Hell no, better throw our money on a dumpster fire of lobbyism and denial.

    Just out of spite i will from now on refer to milk as cow drink.

  • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    Should name products made from animals as they are: spherical gassed pig after a short, miserable life without ever seeing daylight. Or: salty fat from methane burping cows that could also have fed their killed off offspring.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      salty fat from methane burping cows that could also have fed their killed off offspring.

      Who eats suet and why have you made it salty? I’d think “salty fat” would be closer to bacon.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Well I’m sorry to say but I think you just won’t be able to come up with anything that would deter someone.

          • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Common sense to stop meat consumption also has not worked sufficiently until now. Any ideas for a better strategy? Or just plunge forward into an inhabitable planet, discarding any responsibility, mistreating animals as we go?

              • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Literally no idea. You can’t see cause and effect, can you? No sense of empathy neither. Ah well, you’re not alone, unfortunately. For the moment.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  Again, black and white.

                  There’s no arguing a moron who keeps pretending it’s black and white. I’ll prove to you just how asinine your view is: my brother is a hunter. They cull roe deer to keep the population in check, since humans have been the apex predator in these parts for thousands of years.

                  If they didn’t cull them, the population would destroy the entire ecological system, which would lead to all the deer dying, eventually. Not to mention increased deer accidents on roads, killing more people.

                  So while you like to pretend that death is horrible and to be avoided at all costs if you can, but then end up advocating practices which would lead to suffering and death, just indirectly.

                  Ie if you’re put into a trolley problem, you’re the type to just stand there without pulling the lever which would save several life at the cost of one, because “murdering is wrong and I’d bw actively killing the other person myself”. Meaning that you put your own ideas and the sense of personality you have above the lives of others. Not just better as ideas, but you’d actually stand there watching the trolley roll over people you could’ve saved, but chose not to, so that you can just blame others.

                  And you talk of empathy, rofl. Maybe start by trying to understand your own thoughts/views.

                  Oh and eating the resulting meat from the culling is fucking delicious AND moral.

                  What would you do with sheep amd cows btw? They require people. Sheep have to be shorn. If you don’t shear your sheep, that’s tantamount to animal abuse. So we end up getting wool, but you don’t think it’s moral to use that. Why?

                  So if you think we can’t keep sheep or cows anymore, and they can’t be released into the wild because they are domesticated species. So then stop letting them breed at all, meaning that in a generation, they’d be completely gone.

                  So you end up advocating for genocide of entire species with this black and white view you have.

                  You know all the produce you eat is protected from pests and other animals? Your avocado isn’t “cruelty-free” dude, and eating avocados when they’re not even grown on the same continent, have them flown to you? But that’s moral again, because you don’t have to personally think about death you’re indirectly causing.

                  So yeah

                  You can’t see cause and effect, can you?