• @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        They used the “You” as in the people, during their growth years to build their platform. Now they are going against the people since they no longer need us.

      • danielbln
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        I mean, I like a good Google hate train as much as the next guy, but that’s kind of a legitimate thing to want.

        • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          It’s YouTube’s fault for setting the wrong expectations when they benefited from wild growth and success by being free all these years. I dare they go 100% paywalled. I know they won’t. Otherwise they can’t double dip on both premium and advertiser money. Even if they manage to go 100% paywall, it’s inevitable that they will start introducing adverts to paying customers as well.

  • @davemeech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    So I have YouTube premium but also have ad-blocker, for the first time yesterday I was noticing absolutely abysmal speeds on YouTube and I suspect this is why. I thought my computer was starting to shit the bed initially it was so brutal.

    • @CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have premium, uBlock Origin, and Mullvad VPN. In Firefox the other day, the stream was dying every 10-30 seconds. Like it would just stop and give me a spinner. I would have to “Copy URL at current time”, open a new tab, and paste it in to get it to go any further. I do have bad internet, but this was nuts. And then I gave up and used Duck, and it played flawlessly in their embedded player.

      Good job, Google.

      If it happens again, I’ll try disabling uBlock Origin on YouTube and see if it improves.

    • @Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      I have YouTube premium

      Wow, so you pay them and they still screw you? Glad that’s a product I’ll never buy then!

      • @davemeech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I know, right? But I suppose their reasoning is that my ads are also blocked across the rest of their ecosystem, my subscription isn’t covering those losses.

        Still though, a model that requires that customers look at something they don’t want to nor will engage with smells like failure.

        • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          The sick twist is that I use Ublock Origin and won’t ever pay for YouTube premium and I haven’t experienced even the slightest issue streaming videos on YouTube. 😂

        • @Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          I’m generally okay with the idea of “you can get it for free and we’ll include ads to pay for it, or you can pay instead”.

          Where I’m definitely not okay is “you can pay, and we’ll include ads anyway.”

      • @CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I have YouTube premium and an adblocker and I don’t have this problem. I’m skeptical that it’s related.

          • @essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            So, since writing the above I’ve been having issues with YouTube. I’ve been connected to my VPN, so perhaps that’s part of it (by which I mean Google slowing it down, the VPN doesn’t noticeably slow down any other sites).

            I tried deactivating my ad blocker, but it hasn’t made a difference. I’ll try more stuff to see if I can figure it out.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I have YouTube premium and an adblocker and I don’t have this problem. I’m skeptical that it’s related.

          I too am a YouTube premium customer, and my video performance is horrible lately.

          Funny enough, on my living room smart TV YouTube app my performance has been bad as well, even though I am logged in to my premium YouTube account.

          Something is going on, and it does effect some (at least) premium customers.

      • @essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Anecdotally at best. I know it’s not what you want to hear, but you’re making a conclusion based on something one person said.

    • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I was wondering if this was coming. I don’t use YouTube in-browser much if at all, so I don’t see this. But I am not surprised. The fact that they’re slowing down people who pay for premium is kind of an act of war. It shouldn’t be a thing, and the fact that it’s happening at all is a misstep on Google’s part. Not that the whole slowing down people who use ad blockers isn’t. But this will detrimentally affect adoption of premium subscribers which I thought was the last thing they’d want. Because they obviously don’t make enough off ad revenue to support the platform. That’s part of why they push premium so hard. They need more premium subscribers. This is idiocy.

      • @davemeech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I can’t remember what video I watched that talked about the unsustainabilty and likely the late stages of an ad revenue driven internet content model, and this situation reeks of that.

        I don’t know what new paradigm might replace it if this is the case, but the current model feels like it’s absolutely failing.

  • Zombie-Mantis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nationalize YouTube.

    Specifically, nationalize the backend, Google can keep their website. And place it in the hands of something like the UN, rather than any specific country. I hardly trust Uncle Sam any more than Google’s investors. They’ve successfully monopolized video hosting, now turn it into a public resource.

    And open it up to the world, too. Google might get to keep their website, but everyone else can access the same database, too. May the best front end win.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Man, it’s wild to see Youtube kill themselves in real time.

  • @CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Anything better than listening 3 songs and getting 5 ads.

    Stop being trash youtube. Be normal like you once were and i would actually consider a paid subscription IF i get to fully exclude shorts on my side of the platform.

    • @WhipperSnapper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Not at all a solution, but worth mentioning that in a YouTube URL you can replace /shorts/ with /v/ and get the normal player for the same video.

      • @CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I just want the short form content out of my life, but your tip might help others who dislike the player and not the video’s.

  • @duckmilk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can someone create (or does it already exist?) an app that plays the videos in the background, remove the ads and then let you playback the whole video ad-free? Sort of like you did back in the VHS-days…

  • @swag_money@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    i feel like this has been going on for months now no? or maybe it’s the fact that my laptop is 11 years old now lol