• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Assuming he’s right (and boy, being sued by apple is a huge boost to his credibility), they’re keeping the stupid camera bump thing from the air???

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      how do you propose removing it?

      there are two options, 1) using a smaller,shittier camera, or 2) making an extremely thick phone. neither option is very “apple”, especially for a flagship model.

      considering the vast majority of people use phone cases and will never notice the bump anyway, i think this whole thing is blown way out of proportion.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        The marketing about it being an incredibly thin phone was a misstep - it just looked absurd to have such a chunky lump stuck onto it, and it felt very much like they were attempting a have cake / eat cake situation by claiming it had incredible camera stats (which werent very good) to justify the bump on an otherwise amazingly thin phone, and then that giant electronics bump had an external lens on it too.

        Had it just been an ugly phone, I doubt it would have met with anywhere near the same criticism, but all the adcopy about how thin it was overtop of photos where you could see it had a giant lump on it felt really dishonest, and if this article is accurate it may count among the biggest apple flops ever.

        (The thickness may just need to be accepted at this point. The S25 Ultra is 8.2mm, which is thinner than the Air if you include the bump. It seems like the camera wasnt the issue then, but that they hamstrung their design team with their drive for a thin phone. What elegance might even an extra millimeter of chassis space produced?)

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          The marketing had nothing to do with it not selling. Pick one up, yeah it’s thin but it’s also a bar of soap to hold. Plus a ton of deal breaking trade off like less battery life and poor camera system compared to the alternative iPhone 17s/Pros.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      It does not surprise me that the Air is literally the folding phone without the second screen.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        It slightly does me, given that the Air was (apparently) a huge commercial flop. You’d think they’d revisit the soundly mocked design instead of recycling it, or at least change it? The renders may very well be overstating it, of course, but still it’s an odd feature to carry over.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      The stupid camera bump thing they totally didn’t steal from Google

      Edit: Yes, I’m totally butthurt about that guys. Fuck Tim Apple!!11

  • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Breakthrough technology, never seen before in the mobile market. Apple, like always, surprises the word with the latest never seen before tech that will become mainstream in the near future, thanks to apple and its affordable pricing for everyday customers.

    Now just slap that 2,5-3k RRP on the device and let it sell out in.

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Apple’s entire history as an org has been as a fast follower, not a first mover.

      The Apple Newton is a great example of why they avoid being a first mover.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I mean, do they even have a case against them? It’s not like they stole the information, or signed a contract with Apple.

    Also, fuck Apple, and Google, and the rest of them. If they can’t keep a lid on their “secrets”, that’s on them.

    I’m focusing on the lawsuit part, because IDGAF about new phones.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m prone to believing that a lot of those things presented as “leaks” are actually the company in question doing it by themselves behind the curtains - because let’s face it - people want sensationalism and they won’t shut up about something like that.

      Someone forgot an unreleased phone at a bar? I call bullshit.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 days ago

    I was actually looking at foldable phones a few weeks back, seems like 2 screens isn’t enough to make a difference, but 3 screens are. It’s either I get that or a foldable 1 screen phone (like a flip phone).

    On another note, after Tim apple bribed Trump with a gold ball I’ve decided to no longer buy apple products again. And it’s kind of a big deal because I’ve had iPhones since 2008.

    • PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Buy secondhand, especially if you still want iphones. Money goes to lower class (something like Facebook marketplace has no tax), no money to “less bad” competing companies, and you’ll get a much cheaper product which still has the “appleness” you want.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      It makes huge difference. I’m on Fold since Fold 4 and would never go back to a slab phone mostly because I just read books or text web/social media. The square display is perfect for this as you get proper 80-120 character lines with large font and enough space for media etc.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    As if a foldable mobile was some kind of industry super secret anyway. Apple is a joke.

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    There are a few people that Apple would love to delete from the face of the planet.

    Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, who’s consistently divulging Apple’s plans, is one. TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who is always sharing information based on his supply chain checks, is high up on the list, too.

    Apple uses Gurman for controlled leaks to build hype. He hasn’t been sued yet.

    But YouTuber Jon Prosser is public enemy number one that Apple is trying to truly silence. And for good reason: the man who Apple sued in July for leaking iOS 26 and Liquid Glass keeps spoiling Apple’s unreleased products with high-quality 3D renders in his videos

    Now Prosser, Apple definitely doesn’t use him for leaks since he is being sued. He’s just an idiot.

  • Lyubo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 days ago

    Two iPhone Airs sticked together for the price of two and a half. Great job 👏

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Omg it is it even has the horrible curved screen and little notch. How could apple do this horrendous design. Oh wait they gave the notch.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Watched the video on mine. I was thinking the same thing lol. Only difference is the alleged no center dent, which, tbh, people make too big of a deal out of. Once you use it for a bit you don’t even notice it anymore. Meh.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    iPhones are too locked down for the hardware they have. I’m writing this on an iPhone 15 …

    The foldable I like the most I’ve seen are the Motorola razrs. That’s vertical. The best fat foldables are going to be Android because of all the video game emulators for Android

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t understand the last sentence. All the video game emulators for Android compared to what OS? Because at this point, RetroArch emulates pretty much everything, and is available for Android and iOS. Running anything that needs hardware caching on iOS needs sideloading of course.

      So what is it that makes the Android foldable experience better for emulators than, say, an iPad?

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Interesting, didn’t hear of that yet. Apparently, Apple changed their stance on emulators in summer 2024. Before that they had emulators banned completely from the iOS store. Now it appears that they allow them, at least Retroarch.

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Remove the outside screen and all cameras and I’d be slightly more interested.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    A 5.5” screen is way too small to be worth it. If this costs more than an an iPad + iPhone Pro, this thing is gonna flop more than the Vision Pro did.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Tbh, I think that Apple makes stuff like the Vision Pro not to make money but to appear as if they have some kind of technological leadership.

      They can claim that they have the best headset on the market. No need to actually sell any units.

      (And of course other manufacturers could make just as nice headsets for that price point, but most other manufacturers actually need to sell units and thus they build them with realistic hardware.)