YouTube intensifies fight against ad blockers showing pop-ups, and users are frustrated | Blocking ad-block users::undefined

  • Gilberto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    Use Firefox, update the uBlockOrigin extension, update the filters, remove any other adblocking extension in case you have it. Should work just fine then.

    • @KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      not working for me anymore, I have firefox + ublock and updated the filter, they are blocking now after 3 videos

      • @AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same here. That’s not 3 videos per day, but total before it stops playing.

        I wonder what tech and it creators say about this change. They will probably see a dip in views, engagement and number of clicks they promised their sponsors.

    • @londos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I use Firefox with uBlockOrigin and haven’t had to do any manual updates or anything. I still seem to be unaffected by the changes everyone is talking about. Is it a slow rollout or does uBO just silently keep up with it?

      • Gilberto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        It could be simply luck because it is a slow rollout, or it could also be that you got the filter updates on the background. In any case, you know what to do if you ever run into it.

      • Gilberto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, they can, it will probably become a cat and mouse situation. The main idea is to put pressure on people that will not take the time to keep looking for alternatives or new solutions and will simply pay up or watch the ads.

  • @yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    87.7% of the users watch on mobile, they are this mad about 12.3% possibly having access to an adblock.

    • Mkengine
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Do you mean 87.7% use the YouTube iOS/Android App or 87.7% use their smartphone to watch YouTube? Because in the latter case you also can use ReVanced, Firefox + Adblock, Invidious, etc.

    • @HolyDriver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Insert smug “I run YouTube with Firefox with adblock installed” comment here. I’ve not seen any of the anti block stuff yet

  • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    I was fine with ads a couple years ago, but the number, length and frequency of them keeps ramping up. This wouldn’t need to be such a struggle if they just were reasonable about it.

    • @Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      There is no being reasonable in a capitalist society. The only thing that matters is profit potential

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Unfortunately there’s too many people that just roll over and take it at much higher levels than is reasonable. They’ll stop when the normies start to walk away, and from what I can see that sits at about the Idiocracy TV scene level.

    • @Rhapsodicjock_108@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Me : clicks a helpful tutorial of 5 minutes. YT: here have an unskippable ad 5 seconds. Me: annoying but the creators have to make money somehow I guess. YT: and now here’s your skippable ad. Me: I just want this to be over with. YT content creator: Hello guys this video is sponsored by Raycons. 10 seconds blabbering on the product, skip skip Me: closes video.

      • @Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Does anyone else kinda miss when youtube was more informal, random, less edited, and more janky? Nowadays everybody has a title card, and a two minute intro greeting, high-end camera setup, and tightly rehearsed script. It’s like they all decided to just recreate the unnecessary bloat and ceremony from classical television, for the sake of “appearing professional” or something?

        For example, a tutorial doesn’t need to begin with a “Hey guys, it’s your pal ASDFGHJKL. Have you ever got your foreskin trapped in a whatever and yada yada yada? Well today I’m gonna show you how to blah blah blah. Now let’s get into the video. But first a word from our sponsor Lockheed Martin…”

        What’s with the “today”? I’m always watching it “today” by definition. And I wouldn’t have clicked it if I wasn’t in that particular predicament. Why not just immediately start showing the solution?

    • @makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      And injected in the most halfassed points of the video. Surely they have the technology to figure out a better way to time the ads.

  • @raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 year ago

    If you have any stored payment methods on Google Pay, I’d remove them. Whose to say they won’t try to sneak some clause in their TOS that says if you use an ad blocker, they will charge you for Premium. removes tinfoil hat

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Whose to say they won’t try to sneak some clause in their TOS that says if you use an ad blocker, they will charge you for Premium

      Meanwhile in EU: “Doom music intensifies…”

  • @JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m still not seeing ads in brave browser, just in case anyone didnt know. On Android Newpipe also works and freetube for desktop too.

    EDIT: I dont care about meaningless internet points but that being said. I have provided 3 options here. None of which have been refuted on technical grounds and have been hivemind downvoted.

    If you have legitimate claims besides the usual “crypto scams” then please post the links. I’m happy to reevaluate my choices based on new information.

    I would need to see evidence of data sharing between brave and third parties that I have not explicitly consented to or packet captures showing data being sent where it shouldn’t, commits pointing to malicious code etc…

    Something that holds water.

  • Joanie Parker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -49
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For as many hours of YouTube I watch 4+ daily at least. I don’t mind paying for Premium to avoid the hassle. Plus I get music with it.

    Edit: haters can ligma. Down vote all you want!

    • @M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      To your point, I watch YouTube more than Netflix or Disney plus. The only reason I’m not paying for YouTube is because I have it for free now.

      The ads are so annoying that I might subscribe for an add free experience if I didn’t have other means to block it.

    • @Squeak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      For as many hours of YouTube that I watch, maybe 1 hour daily, I don’t mind setting my VPN to turkey and paying $15 for the year. I mostly use it for music anyway… I certainly wouldn’t pay the full price for it though.

    • @glarf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yep, same here. Premium is worth it for me too. I don’t understand the entitlement on lemmy with YouTube, it’s worse than reddit.

    • @poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I’m with you, but I’ve found that any post here on Lemmy about YouTube, Spotify, or any other streaming service ends up the same: artists have enough money already, artists are paid better through merchandise and performances (no citation provided and the author acknowledges they don’t actually do this), these services don’t pay enough anyway, non-paying users are entitled to a better experience; all this is to excuse themselves of stealing content from creators they love by bootlegging it illegally.

  • @sugartits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -481 year ago

    I’ll look forward to reading this yet again next week, alongside all the entitlement in the comments section that seem to think running YouTube is free and recommending trash alternatives which have less than 1% of YouTube’s content and don’t even work.

    See you next week!

    • @TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      Google is a multi trillion dollar company. They can afford to run youtube at a loss for decades, if not centuries to come.

      They don’t want to because they are greedy and “need” to grow their profits yearly.

      Get the fuck out of here with your bullshit ass shilling for a corporate entity that would kill you if it was profitable enough.

      • @isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Not to mention they were fine without ads and forcing content creators to spew the whole “like and subscribe or else the algorithm will hunt me down” bullshit. This is all because of corporate greed, it’s so disgusting. They just want to get on the subscription gravy train because it lets them have their cake and eat it too, meanwhile content creators are left out in the cold even though they’re the only reason people still use YT at this point.

  • @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Really hoping some IPFS alternative takes off. Youtube has already been tanking in quality but no one changes because its a monopoly on online videos.

    And if Twitter has shown us anything, it’s that people legitimately won’t leave a crappy platform unless there’s a significant popular and better alternative that can scale immediately to demand.