• ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    I dislike the fact that “ads” can also include crapware being injected into my computer (viruses, tracking cookies, mysterious scripts, etc).

    • neo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you had nothing to hide, you wouldn’t mind Trojans! /s

    • lucid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is this still really a thing? I remember getting some viruses from ads in the very early days of the internet, like late 90s / early 2000s, but can’t remember getting anything in at least the last ten years.

      • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s currently late and I am on my phone, so I can’t research this too well, but for example this thread and official Microsoft link discusses th Adrozek malware which injects you with unwanted ads and information directly from your browser.

        Sure, it’s not a virus in the older sense of the term where someone either burns your drive or takes over your computer and locks you out asking for a ransom, but it’s still piloting you unsuspectingly and you don’t want it.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    The internet is unusable without an adblocker… I recommend uBlock Origin and Pihole.

    • Notorious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      uBlock Origin at a minimum. But I would suggest a privacy focused browser. Librewolf, Mulvad or even Brave. Browsers leak so much information about you it is easy for sites to fingerprint and track you even with an ad blocker.

      https://privacytests.org/

      I know Librewolf is working on their DNS leakage (last section on privacytests.org), but they also allow you to select a privacy focused DNS server which is nice when you’re not on a network you own, so you can’t run PiHole.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    I used to not run an ad block. I figured the ads didn’t bother me so why bother?

    Then I encountered a banner ad that screamed “HELLOOOOOOOOOO” anytime the mouse went over it and I couldn’t download an ad blocker fast enough.

    Advertising companies will do anything they can to annoy the shit out of you, then act like people running ad blockers are the problem.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was fine with unobtrusive ads, I was fine with a minute of ads before a YouTube video. But it got so bad it was constantly interrupting everything. Also want to know what’s extremely unpleasant? Political ads calling for a moral panic against you or taking bigotry against you as a general assumption. I’m not watching that bullshit. My life is better without ads

    • Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I once watched a 60 minute ad because I wondered (what would a 60min ad even be about) and I can’t remember

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ads are just pure negative. There was even one study that calculated this as a direct financial negative, although unfortunately in narrow circumstances: it was calculated that for mobile users in the US, paying for the data transferred to display the ad was more expensive than what the site owner got paid for including it on his site.

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s is indeed a pure negative - for the users. The site and the the mobile carrier both got paid.

      Yes yes, capitalism good.

  • SolidVerse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a necessity. The internet really is unusable without it. Pop-up ads, long unskippable video ads, annoying shovelware scam ads, etc etc.

  • Xanis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    If the ads are unobtrusive and interesting, and not clearly based on harvested personal data, I wouldn’t mind.

    Unfoorrrtunately…

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Don’t a majority of them also use Chrome? Because they’re going to find that their adblockers are less and less effective.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s yet another reason to use a DNS as blocker, and not let your browser use DNS over https.

      I haven’t done it myself yet, but I figure that sooner or later I’ll need to update my router to block all outbound DNS that doesn’t go through my DNS ad blocker. Some devices try to use their own hardcoded DNS to get around them…

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          DNS blocking is about the only way to block ads & tracking on things like streaming devices. You can’t install Firefox or uBlock on an Apple TV for example. You can block ads on many of the apps on the Apple TV as well as all the telemetry they try to collect with a well configured pi-hole and selected DNS blocklists.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            True, but using a computer with an adblocker and a second gen Chromecast (which you don’t need Chrome for) also eliminates that.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        DNS-based ad blocking is unfortunately much less effective. It’s still better than nothing though, that’s for sure.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          A multi-layered approach is the best approach. My pi-hole blocks advertising domains, malware domains, etc. That helps tremendously with all the “smart” devices that include DVRs, streaming devices, etc. where you can’t install something like ublock. I also make sure something like ublock is installed wherever possible.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Because then it can bypass your ad-blocking DNS

          DNS over HTTPS was a great idea for privacy if left in your hands, but immediately ran into the reality of intrusive advertising

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because dns ad blocking is typically done with something like dnsmasq which doesn’t support DNS over HTTPS, though it’s easy enough to setup a resolver/forwarder that does

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, it’s another reason to use Firefox. A Brower that is not owned and managed by an advertisement company.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Then there’s those of us who uninstalled the YouTube app and installed Kiwi so we can install the uBlock Origin chrome plug-in 😅

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Firefox has plug-ins available out of the box on Android, including uBlock Origin.

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Kiwi is a browser with plug-in support out of the box but it’s always good to have options, thanks :)

          • tb_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh, I seem to have misinterpreted your message then. That’s pretty neat

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    I remember the good ol days when the ads would lag up the loading of the page

    Now they all load first and cover the entire content of the page because screw usability

    Looking at you, every news outlet site ever

  • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    and among advertising, programming, and security professionals that fraction is more like two-thirds to three-quarters

    Leopards, face etc

  • BoisZoi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Asked how likely big companies would be to abuse their data, Americans were most wary of TikTok (59 percent), followed by: Meta (56 percent), X/Twitter (49 percent), OpenAI (48 percent), Google (44 percent), Apple (41 percent), Amazon (40 percent), Microsoft (38 percent), Comscore (32 percent), and Adobe (31 percent).

    I’m surprised people trust Microsoft and Amazon more than Apple; Amazon needs all the data they can get on you to build “better” profiles on what to sell you, ties your Alexa requests to feed advertising (you can opt out) and Microsoft, especially with Edge (post advertising and services team takeover) has been trying to send everything to Microsoft to feed both ads and their AI. FFS, even Outlook warns you now that they’ll share your data with >800 “partners”.

    Apple is no saint, far from it, but people trust a conglomerate over it?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Apple

        • doesn’t have advertising as a core part of their business
        • is using privacy as a selling point.
        • pretty much every release has privacy features.

        Yes I trust them more than most.

        • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          They don’t need adv, users are locked inside their platform - so they protect their users from the outside while they use them from the inside (in the end not much different from the others)