• @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I understand why Louis likes privacy.com so much. But he really needs to stop telling people to use them as a means of stopping payment with scummy vendors and companies so frivolously without having a disclaimer that it can open that person up to getting their credit dinged for non-payment.

    Maybe he doesn’t care about such things, but his viewers might.

    To get around the Blizzard dark pattern the “right way”, agree to the EULA, login, cancel subscriptions, remove payment details, close account (if possible), stop using Battle.net, done. Now the EULA is irrelevant. This also has the knock on effect of being the path that Blizzard/Activision/MS will actually notice since it will cost them money at scale in a way they can’t explain away as childish internet trolling.

    Edit: a word (irreverent > irrelevant)

  • @aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    903 months ago

    “Maybe if Activision gets bought by Microsoft, Blizzard won’t be as scummy.”

    Hahaha, nope.

    Between the company rape culture and enabling internet & gambling addiction, Blizzard is dead to me.

    Support your local private servers.

    • TrumpetX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      Have you found any good private server sublemmies? Whatever we’re calling them?

      • @Alenalda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Idk if there are any sublemmys for it but I’ll take this time to recommend the private server I’ve been enjoying for the last year. Wow-hc is a small tight knit community, we just cleared molton core a couple weeks ago and are slowly progressing through the content. It’s very blizzlike and the dev is active and fixes problems very fast. I know hardcore wow isn’t for everyone but deaths can be appealed in the event of disconnects and bugs which is what drew me to it, where other private servers if the server crashes you are just out of luck.

  • @Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    913 months ago

    First Roku did a quick force TOS change before a beach disclosure, now Blizzard is mysteriously forcing a change to their TOS. I have no idea what’s coming next. Seems like it’s going to become part of the breach playbook to minimize financial loss. Maybe there will be a law against it in… oh…15 years?

    • @STOMPYI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      343 months ago

      So i’m not a lawyer but isn’t there a law for unconsciability, When a contract is so one-sided, it’s obvious that me the signer has absolutely no rights.The entire contract is voided.

      • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        EULAs and TOSes are as legally binding as a secondhand piece of toiletpaper with a contract written in shit. Almost every single one will be thrown out in court. The problem is getting to that point in the first place, and incurring the (time, effort & money) costs while enduring. Most common people can’t afford that, which the companies know, so they keep making unenforceable EULAs.

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 months ago

          That is true in US. In EU litigations cost are way lower and a single person could sue, win and not be financially broken.

          Problem is only that in any case what you pay for a lawyer is more than you win, so it make no sense to sue in any case.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Let me laugh if Blizzard’s TOS change is because of a security breach they haven’t disclosed yet.

    • @ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Roku wasn’t breached. They reported that a bunch of people who had reused passwords from other breached sites were compromised.

        • @ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          The TOS had nothing to do with having announced that some peoples’ accounts had been compromised due to password reuse from other hacked sites. People just started conspiracy theoryin’

  • @Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    I haven’t watched Louis’ video, but I do have a Blizzard account, and up until a couple of days ago I had an active WoW subscription (ended because I wanted to play other games, not to make a point).

    I didn’t get presented with any new terms recently, presumably I will in the future should I decide to sign up again, or even dip in on a free trial account.

    I did look up the terms though. I’m not in the US so it’s not clear if I’d be bound by it anyway but not only do they have an opt-out clause (11.A.vi) they’re actually less egregious than some EULAs, allowing opt-out via email, rather than requiring a mailed in letter (Roku) and being prominently highlighted at the top.

    Lot of folks here dreaming about them going bankrupt, I have to say, I think that’s wishful thinking. The current WoW expansion has been very successful with the highest signups and retention in a long time as they’ve apparently figured out what players actually want. Even without their other IP’s they’re doing ok.

  • @kwebb990@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    hopefully a class action lawsuit in the making. i wouldnt think doing this would hold up in court would it? INAL tho