• @Impronoucabl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 days ago

    Interesting concept, but not very scalable. It’s basically a reversed dam - when it’s full, there’s 0m head of water. Then with excess energy, you lower the level inside, storing the energy in the water outside. E.g -2m head. Water then flows in to equalise head, and doing so, regenerates electricity. Adding depth to supercharge pressure differentials is a good idea, although I wonder how they limit the flow rate, or otherwise prevent cavitation shocks each cycle.

    Could be useful as a private industrial battery, but a dam would still be better on an infrastructural level.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 day ago

      Like a battery, it’s not scalable as a one off, but it may be as a modular mass produced item.

      Or maybe like a wind turbine. You’d have a field of them comprising a power plant. If you lose some individuals, who cares. If you need to do maintenance you can take one offline or entirely replace it without really impacting the power plants output

      • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 hours ago

        An easy manufacturing method would be to 3d print in plastic a double walled shell, with fill holes for concrete, and mounting chanels for motors. Plastic “lining” would provide salt water protection for the concrete.

    • @khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      Dams have issues around silt buildup over time and to the best of my understanding the US is already dammed to the max (within reason).

      I’m keen to see how it pans out. Seems like a very interesting concept.

      • @blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        Plus the places most suited for dams also tend to be natural wonders. Rip Glen Canyon and Hetch Hetchy

      • pelya
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 days ago

        Silt did not magically disappear because your dam is spherical, and there is a lot of it on the sea floor. They need to install some kind of filtering system anyway.

        Also, the lifetime of a sphere is estimated to be 60 years, while the traditional dam is engineered for 100+ years of service.

        The main advantage is that the sea floor is unused and unregulated like the dry land , but then you could as well build an actual scuba diving underwater base with a hydro dam instead of a sphere, it will also be easier to clean and repair, but I guess that would be too much evil moustache twirling to get funded.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          Did they say it was intended to be on the seafloor? I didn’t see that but assumed it would be moored deep enough for water pressure to turbo boost the turbines, but well clear of silt from the sea floor. That would also be a key benefit if you can moor it at the most useful depth but in any depth of water

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            220 hours ago

            The article say about 500/600 meters deep. No mention if on the sea floor or not.