• @khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 day ago

    Dams have issues around silt buildup over time and to the best of my understanding the US is already dammed to the max (within reason).

    I’m keen to see how it pans out. Seems like a very interesting concept.

    • @blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 day ago

      Plus the places most suited for dams also tend to be natural wonders. Rip Glen Canyon and Hetch Hetchy

    • pelya
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 day ago

      Silt did not magically disappear because your dam is spherical, and there is a lot of it on the sea floor. They need to install some kind of filtering system anyway.

      Also, the lifetime of a sphere is estimated to be 60 years, while the traditional dam is engineered for 100+ years of service.

      The main advantage is that the sea floor is unused and unregulated like the dry land , but then you could as well build an actual scuba diving underwater base with a hydro dam instead of a sphere, it will also be easier to clean and repair, but I guess that would be too much evil moustache twirling to get funded.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        Did they say it was intended to be on the seafloor? I didn’t see that but assumed it would be moored deep enough for water pressure to turbo boost the turbines, but well clear of silt from the sea floor. That would also be a key benefit if you can moor it at the most useful depth but in any depth of water

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          217 hours ago

          The article say about 500/600 meters deep. No mention if on the sea floor or not.