• gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          Because that way you’re always chasing the problem instead of anticipating it. We know how Apple/iMessage behave, there is no point in waiting for them to become a problem.

          • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Ok, agreed with how apple act, but iMessage won’t become a problem here, because nobody uses it.

            And if they do, which they won’t, then apple can be added.

            • gian
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              Fine, but why we should always wait for something to become (evenatually) a problem ?

              • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

                Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

                • gian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  210 months ago

                  Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

                  Ok, I understant that. I am not saying that iMessage will be a problem, I am saying that if it will be ever become a problem, then you are will be in a rush to fix it when you could have simply prevented it.

                  Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

                  The law should apply to all chat apps in my opinion.