• gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Because that way you’re always chasing the problem instead of anticipating it. We know how Apple/iMessage behave, there is no point in waiting for them to become a problem.

      • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ok, agreed with how apple act, but iMessage won’t become a problem here, because nobody uses it.

        And if they do, which they won’t, then apple can be added.

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Fine, but why we should always wait for something to become (evenatually) a problem ?

          • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

            Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

            • gian
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

              Ok, I understant that. I am not saying that iMessage will be a problem, I am saying that if it will be ever become a problem, then you are will be in a rush to fix it when you could have simply prevented it.

              Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

              The law should apply to all chat apps in my opinion.