• gian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Because that way you’re always chasing the problem instead of anticipating it. We know how Apple/iMessage behave, there is no point in waiting for them to become a problem.

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Ok, agreed with how apple act, but iMessage won’t become a problem here, because nobody uses it.

      And if they do, which they won’t, then apple can be added.

      • gian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Fine, but why we should always wait for something to become (evenatually) a problem ?

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

          Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

            Ok, I understant that. I am not saying that iMessage will be a problem, I am saying that if it will be ever become a problem, then you are will be in a rush to fix it when you could have simply prevented it.

            Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

            The law should apply to all chat apps in my opinion.