“If it involves money. It’ll be on our platform. Money or securities or whatever. So, it’s not just like send $20 to my friend. I’m talking about, like, you won’t need a bank account.”

Well that sounds terrifying!

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    224
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Just wait till Musk learns about banking regulations.
    He’s already complaining about the EU regulations on social media, but they nothing compared to what banks have to deal with.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The thing about these everything apps is that they filled a niche in the markets they’ve succeeded in. As far as I know, and I could be wrong, Google doesn’t operate their Play services or Google Pay in China, meaning there was a vacuum for something else to fill it. WeChat and AliPay has done that.

          It’d take a LOT of effort to build a platform like Paytm for the U.S., nevermind other markets. You can’t just buy a microblogging platform and magically redevelop it into something like Paytm. He’d need to partner with other businesses and whatnot, and I just don’t see there being any sort of interest in that kind of partnership.

          There’s been attempts to build these sorts of “everything apps” before. Facebook has tried and failed. I think Snapchat has tried it. Apps here in the west tend to focus on doing a single or a handful of tasks really well. If an app ends up doing too much, it’s often split into several apps.

          • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I have trouble imagining this working in the US, even if Musk hadn’t spent a year flushing his cash and credibility down the drain.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I don’t see it working in Sweden either.

              1. We have apps for identifying ourselves digitally, most popular being BankID, but there are alternatives like Freja E-ID and various others.
              2. We have apps for easy money transfers, Swish being the most prominent, and it can be used to pay in stores and such as well.
              3. We have apps that combine economy management and shopping, I’ve no idea how popular they are, but Klarna comes to mind.

              Amazon launched here a couple of years ago, and I think they’ve clawed out a niche in the market shockingly, but they’re not the “go to marketplace” for everything. If I want to buy electronics there’s like at least half a dozen online (that often have physical locations) stores I’d go to first. Same thing for larger appliances, clothes, make-up/beauty/skin-hair-care, shoes, sporting goods, furniture. Amazon is mostly for like weird niche stuff, like it’s the only place I could find a detergent that’s designed for robot mops that doesn’t contain tea-tree oil. Amazon is also a decent place to find mass-produced cheap garbage tat, like LED string lights and what have you.

              They also make use of the same delivery services that all other stores do, so there’s no point in using them if you want speedy deliveries. I also don’t feel safe as a buyer when using Amazon because while I’m sure they have to be compliant with Swedish consumer laws, I’m also positive they’ll make the experience as tricky to navigate as possible. If I buy a motherboard from say Inet, and it breaks, I can just send an email to Jonas at Inet and they’ll sort it out. Nothing will be that straight-forward with Amazon.

              Anyway, the point of that massive segue is; if a MASSIVE specialised company like Amazon has failed to fully establish themselves in their own niche here in Sweden, how on earth would a broken microblogging platform manage to “out-compete” other, trusted, and established services?

              Musk is aiming to use twitter for a niche that doesn’t exist. Literally the only demand for this dream platform of his, is himself.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Without getting official government institutions on board or making the app mandatory in some way, I don’t see how this would work outside of authoritarian countries

          They’re bleeding users and advertisers as it is

        • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Which are basically operating systems, and therefore not needed and against the rules of the iOS and Android app stores.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Is it possible to remain subscribed to Technology but not get posts about this person?

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There are going to be a lot of people saying how stupid this entire concept is in the comments.

    Let me tell you something, as a person who spent years in finance. There’s no fucking chance on Earth this happens. You will win the Powerball twice consecutively before Musk pulls this off.

    None of this infrastructure exists in X and all of this infrastructure is exactly the kind of shit Musk hates. Automobile regulations are fucking nothing compared to financial regs.

    Adoption aside, which you’d have to be fucking insane to adopt this platform as a payments platform, the regs alone will ensure this never, ever, materializes.

    What Musk describes will someday exist. He will not be involved, and the day is well over a decade away.

    This is “Kanye West running for President” level of stupidity. The people close to him have let him down by not telling him how stupid this is.

    • indianactresslover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      The people close to him have let him down by not telling him how stupid this is.

      More like, he fired every one who would dare to say that. And those who still are with him know it’s a stupid idea to tell him that.

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well that’s unfortunate. I’d love to toss my savings into something this impulsively reckless dingus concocted

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      He’s going to make a Robinhood/PayPal clone and it’s not going to work. Why? Because we already have Robinhood and PayPal.

      It’s just such a dumb idea, the only people that will fall for it are cryptobros.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      All true, but there’s no detail in that article saying that’s what he wants to do. Copying Apple’s approach where they’re a front end to an existing bank, also fits the narrative.

      I wonder if an app to unite all your online services would be legit, but I can’t see those services cooperating with that, so you’d effectively have to be malware

  • sanqueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You won’t need a bank account because all your money will be stored in my account 🤣

  • hogunner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “Money or securities or whatever.”

    Spoken like a true genius. /s

    Keep burning your money, Elon; I can’t wait until you’re poor enough that no one gives a fuck what your latest horrible hot take or idea was. You won’t be missed.

  • SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As someone who worked for a tech banking company many years, you are too stupid to do it.

    This shit is complicated as fuck.

    Oh and all the tech in the world or capital you could build is worthless unless you have that sweet banking / credit license in US. And lets just say its really really hard to cone by nowadays.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh please. It ain’t complicated. I could write a ruby app in a weekend that would do everything a bank does. It’s just subtracting from one account and adding to another.

      • Elon Musk probably.
    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is literally prior art from him in this regard. He just decided to call it a payment processor so he did not have to do all that bit about it being other people’s money.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh boy, if Elon Musk has trouble dealing with regulators and oversight agencies when managing his car company or his social media company, imagine what a wakeup call it’s going to be when he wants to start dealing with banking regulators. 0% chance he doesn’t run afoul of them in the first year trying to run his business by the seat of his pants like he does with all the others.

    Yet another half-baked idea to spill out of the mouth of this fucking moron with too much money for his own good.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve reached the point where I will downvote anything relating to Elmo the muppet.

    • haruki@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ugh, my feed in Lemmy is full of this now. Is it feasible to “lower” the visibility of a keyword like “Musk” or “X”?

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    Prediction: He’s going to try to pay his employees in Xits: Your going to negotiate a salary based on a floating exchange rate with a new cryptocurrency and then when it starts to tank he will refuse to renegotiate based on the fact that its headed for the moon!

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s the return of company scrip.

    The most-garbage/toxic notion of tech platforms these days is when they masquerade as tech platforms but are really unregulated banking platforms.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s strange, because I wouldn’t, not even for a moment, ever in my life consider this.if I feel this way, so does a large chunk of the population.

    So its already failed imo.

    • onlinepersona@programming.devBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I dunno, it has 200M active users, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t surprise me if “free bank” popped up in their face a few times a week with “free transfers” and “guaranteed best interest rates”.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good point.

        I dunno, it has 200M active users, doesn’t it?

        It’s hard to be really sure, because we know there’s a staggering number of bots.

        But I suppose even if the real number is a fraction of that 200M, it’s still a huge number of users.

  • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Musk must have a fetish for having government regulators up his ass. The FTC is already up there to where he screams like a pig. Now add banking-but-not-a-bank and they’re going to be up there even further.