‘Organize your co-workers’ is not a normal thing to say as it implies you have control over them but coworkers are equal. It reads “organize your staff” in a how_do_you_do_fellow_kids.png way. "Organize with your coworkers’ may come off better but “around AI” isn’t explicit either in support or opposition to AI. So what the title means has to be inferred.

I had assumed it was more spam.

The title and the generic image.

Calling it, next update includes forced arbitration clause for accidental bricking.

I think that’s someone else (if you were unaware).

Hyprland*

I thought the title was “Why is it so hard to get Nvidia working with Linux” but I was mistaken. That’s the answer.

[Linus_Saying_FU_Nvidia.mkv]

Perhaps I’m just not the target audience for a pretty UI rework but it really grinds my gears to see it be running in Firefox. A whole browser for a GUI is insane?? I’m sure it will improve with time but when it loaded on my VM it reminded me of a virus opening a browser window.

“Binding arbitration” = “we’re taking away your right to sue us”

Not something they should be allowed to do, just because being sued for illegal activities is expensive.

“Innovation” used to mean better prices and/or better products. Adding adverts to a product you already own isn’t innovation.

Was hoping we’d stop all that after the Queen died. Doesn’t feel the same saying “King”.

A “suspicion of malicious communications” in the land of the free, how could that be, I didn’t speak out because it didn’t affect me.

Thanks, I wanted to say that but I couldn’t figure out how to spell it.

Given Reddit’s past unreasonableness, I wouldn’t be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

Won’t load for me.

I’m not writing a paper or essay… so my standards are different.

Conversely I’ve tried following a paper to implement an algorithm and suddenly found it used math terms that I couldn’t find an explanation for (and unlike the rest of the paper it didn’t elaborate shit).

That sounds like a generic issue one should expect. I wouldn’t consider this a specific party’s talking point until they suggest a solution that isn’t just better reasoning, better logic, better evidence.

The answer to any bias in Wikipedia is to cite more verifiable sources, use better sound reasoning and update when newer evidence is found.

The answer is probably not the wishful thinking of one of USA’s unrepresentative main parties. To learn about public misrepresentation in government check out a page from Wikipedia.

It looks like you’re organizing a meeting, would you like with that?

Yes / No

Waiting on a software freedom-respecting headset.

Do stocks go up from such a cringe-move?