“If it involves money. It’ll be on our platform. Money or securities or whatever. So, it’s not just like send $20 to my friend. I’m talking about, like, you won’t need a bank account.”

Well that sounds terrifying!

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s strange, because I wouldn’t, not even for a moment, ever in my life consider this.if I feel this way, so does a large chunk of the population.

    So its already failed imo.

    • onlinepersona@programming.devBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I dunno, it has 200M active users, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t surprise me if “free bank” popped up in their face a few times a week with “free transfers” and “guaranteed best interest rates”.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good point.

        I dunno, it has 200M active users, doesn’t it?

        It’s hard to be really sure, because we know there’s a staggering number of bots.

        But I suppose even if the real number is a fraction of that 200M, it’s still a huge number of users.