• SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is a copy/pasted message I wrote up on another thread. As long as there are people in the comments shilling kagi, I will shill my prefered engines. At least my suggestions will bring awareness to free as in freedom projects. I hope to god people paying 10$/month just to not get datacucked by search engines will also learn something and save their money.

    SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host.

    I personally trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, whos server is located on the other side of the planet, with my query info over Google/Alphabet any day.

    Its nice to be able to email and have a human conversation with your search engine provider thats just a knowlegable every day joe who genuinely believes in the project and freely dedicates their resources to it. Consider sending some cash their way to help with upkeep if you like the services they provide, they will probably appreciate and make use of that 10$ better than kagi.

    Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn’t seem to give good results try a few others.

    Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query

    search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won’t index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you. Its also open source and self-hostable

    Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses peer-to-peer technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to both run their own local instance and help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets.

    They have a public instance available through a web portal. To be upfront, YaCy is not a great search engine for what most people usually want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But, it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine looks like untainted by SEO scores or corporate money-making shenanigans.

    I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I know these options are so unknown to most people.

    • TwoGems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thank you! So I can use Google but stop it from doing the CAPCHA shit repeatedly because it detects my VPN? It’s abuse of the user and I’m tired of it.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t know what the fuck is going on with Kagi on Lemmy. They must be using bots or paying people for promoting them. I just don’t get how people can trust them so much when they haven’t released the code for anything, they require you to be logged in which makes the user uniquely identifiable and therefore could easily correlate your searches to your identity (even if they claim not to, it’s just a “trust me, bro”)

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah it’s ridiculous, seems like there’s a shill army of this proprietary service here.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      shilling kagi

      Shilling means that you’re claiming people (like me) who’ve been recommending Kagi are in fact secretly paid to do covert advertising.

      Are you using that word wrong, or do you actually believe that we’re all liars?

    • doktorseven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      When you need a scalable service for tons of users, federated isn’t going to cut it. This is why Apple wants DDG. Point the bajillion crApple lusers at one of your public instances (or even all of them chosen at random each time) and watch it crash and burn overnight. DDG has tons of servers and the infrastructure to hold up while a ton of people search why their luxury device is slowing down every time Apple releases a new one.

      • dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Lol Federation is the definition of scalable. Everyone serves their local users -> a miniscule amount of global traffic, everything but auth always stays local.

        Universities have been doing it since the beginning of the internet. Email is the biggest example but there are others: eduGAIN and eduroam are the most notable ones coming out of the academic community.

        • doktorseven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You are confusing a network of distinct servers with a single point of entry that a search engine would need to be. There is no fallback or distribution of search when everything is directed to a single search point, and pointing people to different search sites per search will remove any per-site preferences.

          Do people think about what they say any more, or do they see someone who is trying to carefully explain their problem and just go into pure rage and try to disprove them by spewing things that do not make any sense?

          • dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            No search engine has a “single point of entry”. Every search engine has Cache servers all over the world at almost every major IXP. Nothing would prevent a federated service from operating the same way. Cloudflare or literally any form of loadbalancer or load balancing service could be used to redirect queries to fedisearch (or whatever the service name would be) to the local instance by IP geolocation. Authentication can just be forwarded to the home server via SAML, thats also where the settings can be stored and queried at login time by the local instance. SAML assertions are very scalable, and there needs to be no global login server, since every users login query can be forwarded to his home instance, where his profile is loaded. The full search index could be put into a blockchain that every local instance joins - every instance crawls their area and publishes new results to the chain. You seem to know very little about how the internet works, yet you accuse me of raging.

            That the foss community can manage things like that has been proven for years. Debian mirror server network works in a similar way (they run their own loadbalancer ofc), while being cryptographically secure. And if you wanna see a federated login network like i described in action, just go to https://pubs.acs.org/action/ssostart

            All these parts i described are existing technology and in global use. The combination is not, but there is nothing that would prevent a foundation from implementing search like this.

    • AllegedlyInsane@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Would also recommend whoogle. They have done public ones iirc but also hand a self hosted option (that I use behind a VPN) for those that line self hosted shit

  • mightygalahad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t Google pay billions to Apple for the top spot? Why would they want to lose that stream of free cash?

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      If the goodwill they garner from that makes APPL go up because it matches the privacy expectation they are branding themselves with, they might be making even more money anyway.

      • ohlaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Exactly. They are trying to win the privacy game, so a small sacrifice now could turn to be quite profitable.

    • glockenspiel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Could be that Apple will acquire DuckDuckGo. A little hasty to presume it I suppose, but Apple has to wonder how much money they are leaving on the table by taking Google’s payments. If Google will pay them more than $9 billion/year just to be default—what does that say about how profitable Apple’s absolutely huge and locked-in base can be?

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Could apple be using the press as part of their bargaining strategy with google over the default search engine fee?

      • QHC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How is Apple going to monetize DuckDuckGo to make up for that $9 billion, without compromising their other efforts w/r/t user and data privacy?

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          How much do they monetize Apple Maps for? Sometimes companies just buy something to be a service supporting the thing they actually sell.

        • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          efforts

          I think the appropriate word here is marketing. There’s no real privacy in an Apple device.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a big anti trust case against Google right now and this arrangement with apple is one of the topics of interest. If Google loses they could be forced to stop paying.

  • plantedworld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    I started using duck duck go a few months ago and have felt like my search results are a lot more useful since.

    The maps function on it sucks though

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Duck duck go sucks for porn I stopped using it a while ago. Until they fix that I’m out.

  • Mr_Rosewater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been using it this way for years. I don’t use google products at all now and don’t miss it.

  • uglyduckling81@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Duck duck go needs a lot of work to replace Google search.

    I’ve used it for years but often I still get the shits and just bring Google up after duck duck go fails to find what I’m looking for.

    • fprawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, have had a similar experience. I find the more specific or niche a question is, the better google is at finding relevant pages. DDG is perfectly fine the rest of the time, though, so I keep it as the default.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Did DDG move away from consolidating results from Google and other engines?

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    On Safari (iOS), Apple makes it easy to switch. Settings > Safari > Search Engine and select which one you want. I’ve been using DDG not quite a year and at first the change felt a lil jarring, but knowing I’m contributing less to Google’s ad revenue and their long list of privacy violations, I’m comfortable now sticking with DDG. Change isn’t always easy, convenient, or comfortable, but it can be done with just the tiniest bit of effort.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      this is a very poor argument. every browser I’ve used, even Chrome, makes it easy to change the default search engine in the settings.

  • Nihilore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I tried to switch to DDG as my default search on iOS but my adblocker doesn’t block ads on it but it does on google, so I switched back

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Duck duck go is crap these days, probably since it uses Bing. All I ever get are “7 best ways to…” click bait, probably AI generated “articles”.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been trying to use DDG but honestly it sucks. I can’t imagine Apple switching to it, it would just make things worse for users, who commonly can’t figure out how to switch defaults. I think it’s just a negotiating point.

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 years ago

      Google search has been fundamentally broken for at least two years. When the protests started on Reddit 90% of Google’s search results we’re broken.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I found this too. After the reddit fiasco, I found DDG to have no downside. The search syntax is a little different (google’s is better) but the outputs arent radically different.