• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m not even against large vehicles as there are legit use cases for them. I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

    • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They already cost more and considering they have worse gas mileage, they paying more taxes on fuel as well.

      I agree with the parking though, back of the lot with ya.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        in reality most (all?) states in the US don’t charge progressively more for vehicle registration based on weight, and even when they do, the thresholds are really high. So a F-150 weighing over 5000 lbs may pay the same as a Honda Civic weighing half of that.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Texas used to, maybe still does. You made me try to look it up and couldn’t find a simple source. Plenty of states use MRSP or some measure of the vehicle’s value.

          Back in the day (Tulsa, OK) my friend had a 2-ton dump truck with antique tags (over 25-yo), paid $20. Meanwhile, someone buying a super-light Corvette was paying $650. (early 90s money)

          I say go on weight, maybe some factoring of value. Registration fees are paying for roads, if your monster vehicle is doing more damage, you pay more.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah my state taxes you based on MSRP too. $25 per $1000 of value, 10% of MSRP value after 5 years.

            So if your MSRP was 50K, it’s $125 forever.

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Except in NJ where you get raked over the coals for your yearly car tax… errr… “registration”.

          It’s the damnest thing; they seem to lose my vehicle registration every year but my marriage registration is good indefinitely.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

      This won’t help with rich assholes who want to drive around an F-950 or whatever, but will make groceries more expensive.

      What really needs to happen is to mandate a special license to drive anything over like 2500 kg, and only be able to register it to a business with a valid use-case. To get a “small car” license (B-type), you have to pass an easy theory exam and drive around a tiny sedan around a city for 30 minutes (at least in europe). Trucks have different driving characteristics and are way more dangerous, so the driving tests should be way more difficult too.

      Also, maybe this?

      Oh, also, ban private cars in cities. Like, completely. Cars are so dangerous that their amount in populated areas needs to be kept to an absolute minimum.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Should have to register them against a business or something that is licensed for truck use… Then let other people rent them.