Gamma@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoRaspberry Pi - Introducing: Raspberry Pi 5www.raspberrypi.comexternal-linkmessage-square80linkfedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down17
arrow-up1584arrow-down1external-linkRaspberry Pi - Introducing: Raspberry Pi 5www.raspberrypi.comGamma@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square80linkfedilink
minus-squareGustavoM@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoNo nvme support? Oh come on. Still using microhdmi? OH COME ON
minus-squareKushan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoApparently there’s going to be an nvme HAT.
minus-squareGustavoM@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoShould have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ““forever”” and is ideal for servers.
minus-squareKushan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoBut that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don’t necessarily need it. Don’t get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I’d have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.
minus-squareMountainTurkey@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that’s why they opted for a HAT
No nvme support? Oh come on. Still using microhdmi? OH COME ON
Apparently there’s going to be an nvme HAT.
Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ““forever”” and is ideal for servers.
But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don’t necessarily need it.
Don’t get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I’d have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.
You got a power button too /s
I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that’s why they opted for a HAT