• LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I sure do love working at an MSP during times like this. Today fuckin sucked. Clients called in non-stop about things being broke AND our ticketing and remote support software was up and down all day

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are too uneducated to just see what works and what doesn’t and add 1 and 1 together. If Google or WhatsApp work and Amazon doesn’t then it‘s definitely an Amazon problem.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Funny, my digitized collection of movies and TV shows seems to be working just fine. :3

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think they were just pointing out that this is the problem with subscription services. You own nothing and you’re screwed when the service goes down.

        It really doesn’t take “ludicrous amounts of time and money” to build a private library. It’s interesting how the subscription giants have managed to change people’s perceptions - when you buy content to keep, you keep some of the value, but when you subscribe you’re just getting a time pass to use someone else’s library and won’t see that money again.

        They sold the proposition on convenience when everything was in one place, but now it’s all fragmented it’s a waste of money.

        And of course plenty of people are building media libraries for free by sailing the seas.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just let us be excited

        This is our version when there’s a big storm and your neighbourhood dads start going around with chainsaws offering to cut up downed trees.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        lmao, buddy you can get a 10tb hard drive for like $200 and fit all the pirated media you want on it. that’s less money than two mainline subscriptions for a year.

        the VAST majority of data hoarders are pirates. very very few actual spend fortunes on their media collections. that’s why everyone is dogpilling you. it felt like you were attacking a strawman of the average user here and they feel the need to correct you about their nature.

        it’s not about pirates feeling moral or superior. it’s about you being wrong about data hoarders.

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            yeah, you certainly can spend more and get better, but most media consumers don’t actually care about long term storage like that.

            i only know the pricing on those drives because i just had to replace one in a nas device. i only spent money on a nas device because i work in media and need to keep large files for clients. i follow a 3-2-1 backup system because my job depends on it, but it’s not at all necessary to enjoy media.

      • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        streaming service: 15-20€ per month per service me: vpn 5€ and a cheap hard drive

        i’d be poorer with subscribing

          • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            i don’t really understand your point. even buying used dvd’s or blu-rays is marginally cheaper than subscription services. people just became too comfortable.

            users pay for convenience and when the service stops their money is gone and they have nothing in return.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dawg even pirate stream sites don’t host on AWS and GCP, you can still watch your content for free online without worrying about a cloud outage because pirate sites actually distribute their files on several cloud platforms since they’re technically always at risk of DMCA lol.

  • poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do these companies still sign with AWS? Didn’t they learn from the last two major outages in us-east? To say nothing of the deceptive business practices to obfuscate service utilization to overcharge businesses?

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For these large businesses, I imagine they get favorable deals, and all the executives probably know each other and scratch each-other’s backs. For smaller businesses, AWS can decrease time-to-market, it’s easy to find people who are already familiar with it, and is seen as less risky than going with some smaller provider. Though, I hate the “cloud” with a passion, and whenever I’m given the choice, I avoid it. It’s quite a bit cheaper in the long run to avoid cloud providers too. On one long project I worked on, we hadn’t had downtime on any of our VPSs longer than a couple minutes over the course of 8 years.

  • albsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    its us-east-1 as usual, I guess its that time of the year. and the companies haven’t changed either… so, basically the IT guys told the budget approvers we need more money they calculated it and said, no. see you next year for another one.

  • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

    I suspect the big problem is that IAM (AWS authentication system) is affected and it is not decentralized, which is causing other systems worldwide to fail because the internal authentication is broken.

    I can’t login to the AWS console to check on my stuff in the European zone, because the login goes through IAM in us-east-1 where all the authentication does.

    It really highlights just how centralized so much of the internet is on like three companies (Amazon, Microsoft, and Google)

    • eah@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It really highlights just how centralized so much of the internet is on like three companies (Amazon, Microsoft, and Google)

      Cloudflare: What am I? Chopped liver?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hehe. Imagine managing your house in the cloud, and suddenly there is no heating, no light, all the “smart” appliances don’t work anymore, and the shower only produces cold water, because the shower thermostat got a “0” as return value when asking for the preferred temperature…

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      There’s a good reason why I refuse to use cloud connected or Internet required “smart” devices.

      It’s essentially an excuse for shitty engineering.

      If you really need a device to be cloud connected then it can also maintain local data when the remote server is down. Even better, it uses an open spec and you can standup your own server.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dream on, meanwhile the world will be buying $8 cloud connected “smart switches” because they’re the cheapest, easiest to install things out there and even grandma is able to say “hey Alexa, turn on the coffee maker” and make it work.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not that far off. I woke up to an Internet outage and none of my home lighting routines fired off and I couldn’t control my lights via wifi. I got it under control shifting to Bluetooth but for a second it was infuriating.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        the fact that your home network setup for this relies on an internet connection is baffling

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had about a dozen WeMo devices controlling various stuff around the house, they just accumulated over the years. About a year ago, I “got serious” and ripped out all the cloud connected stuff and setup a Zigbee based Home Assistant system. It’s about 5x more capable than the old hodge podge of cloud devices, much lower lag, much better management capabilities, and when the internet connection goes down, it still works. The cloud devices would take long coffee breaks about twice a year.

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      God, so many things gone wrong there. At least they could use “30” as the default value, right???

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Looks like it was an Amazon AWS outage. Just geos to how how vulnerable the Internet is as it becomes ever more concentrated into the hands of the tech giants.

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      As someone who works in tech I occasionally point out to people that if Jeff Bezos decided to go full supervillain he could hold the internet hostage. If you disabled AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud individually the cascading failures on the various systems would take weeks to fix, which we might not have with a supply chain collapse. Genuinely, I think there’s a real chance it could trigger the collapse of human civilization

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The mindblowing part of it for me is that a company the size of Disney don’t seem to have the appetite to own and run their own servers.

      These are the same people that managed to get two counties redistricted so that they could own their own city, and to this day literally buy the entire electorate by giving housing only to people who vote the way they’re told to.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re being run by accountants, and one thing accountants hate is paying people to do a job, its always “far easier” just to pay a company for that.