• @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 months ago

    I’ve said this for years as others online have claimed OF is so safe. You don’t know the full story. It is not necessarily a more ethical business model than traditional porn

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s definitely more ethical in that it allows the creators to get more of the money.

      But that doesn’t mean there aren’t issues. Clearly it doesn’t fix the whole issue of people under 18 sometimes making their way into the industry. It’s not a silver bullet that fixes an entire (sometimes problematic) industry.

      I don’t know who was trying to tell you that OF solves everything about the porn industry, there would be no further issues, and that we’d live happily ever after, but that was obviously never going to be the case.

      • @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        OF take 30% I think. What does an average scene make on OF? How does that compare to the pay rate for old school porn?

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think receiving 70% of the prices that you yourself set and deem acceptable is likely better than ?% of whatever PornHub or XHamster say they made from your video predominantly through ad revenue.

          At the very least, it gives creators a great amount more control. In terms of setting prices, in terms of creating content they want to make as opposed to what a production company says, in terms of how you want to advertise, in terms of whether you want to lock your content behind a paid tier or not, etc.

          And 30% is also pretty standard. Google, Apple, Valve, etc all charge 30%. Shit, on twitch it’s 50% IIRC. I’m not saying it’s perfect and couldn’t be cheaper, but it’s the usual market rate.

    • @Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      The main thing I’m getting from the article is that adults who try to profit from abusing children on OnlyFans get arrested.

        • @Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          It seems to me that OnlyFans takes several steps that make it easier for police and prosecutors to do their job, some of which are detailed in the article. What additional steps do you think they should take?

          • @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            None. My point is that there’s a shit ton of abuse out there. Only a tiny amount is caught

            You said the people who do this get arrested. But they don’t. Only a tiny fraction get caught and arrested

            • @Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I guess I’m thinking about this from a solutions-oriented mindset: what concrete, achievable steps can various entities take to reduce child abuse? For an adult content platform, the identity verification steps OnlyFans uses seem reasonable; even when an offender uses an account owned by someone else, that often provides enough of a lead for investigators.

      • @bighatchester@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        My gf had to submit pictures of her ID like 4 times with all her personal information to be able to post . And I had to go through the same process to be able to be included in the videos . So I don’t really understand how moniors can post in there .

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          I would love to know how you would decide if the scan or copy of my ID, with picture, I send you by mail, or upload with a web form as a jpeg, is real or a fake.

  • @TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -372 months ago

    At this point of social decomposition, I suspect that rather than being predators, it is the children themselves who do it.

    • @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Really? There’s like 10 examples here of children being abused and your response is to talk about how kids are bad?

      • @TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -272 months ago

        Yeah I mean I’m not saying there are no predators out there but at this point of a scum society I think the majority of children on OF are not exactly victims of a predator.

        • naticus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 months ago

          What you’re experiencing is generational bias and forming an opinion without actual facts. Be better.

          • @TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -102 months ago

            It’s a matter of common sense… what did you expect to happen with so many abandoned children (without dad, mom or both) with these ideologies of objectification of people and with the easy access that children have to the Internet today. You don’t need to be a genius to realize that most likely the majority of children who are in OF are not necessarily because of a predator in question.

            I understand the lack of studies about this but anyway I believe if you research there will be no information available.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Maybe you are right but the actual facts are that even outside OF there are underage female prostitutes that do it for money or the latest bag from some high end brand and often are prey of some predator. Only difference is that off-line prostitution is harder to find.
            OF is only folowing what it is happening in the real life, making it easier obviously, but it don’t create any new dynamic.

            • naticus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I’m not commenting on the existence of it happening, I’m commenting on the use of the word “majority” to give themselves credibility. It’s dismissive of the issue and a way to ride out your bias as if it’s justified. Does it happen where minors get involved with OF on their own? I have no doubts. Is it the majority of OF accounts where a minor is involved? No one knows and making guesses isn’t productive.

        • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          “majority”

          You sound like you feel guilty after you masturbate and your favorite expedition was the Mayflower

    • @MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Of the 30 cases reviewed by Reuters, more than half resulted in an arrest and at least three in criminal convictions.