• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle






  • It’s fine to highlight it’s correlation, but your guess is a theory of causation. It’s likely either some genetic combo that drives the desire for coffee or some lifestyle arrangement that drives the need.

    Even the idea that an inactive mind leads to deterioration isn’t definitively causation. Correlation goes both ways. Are they mentally healthy because they’re mentally active? Or are they mentally active because they’re mentally healthy? The degree of mental deterioration goes up as you age, which is also when you can retire, when you don’t have to support your family, when you’re physically incapacitated, and when you slow down overall. So yeah, I plan to stay active because I’ll take my chances that it helps, but at some point, something will simply break. Maybe I’ll inherit the dimentia. Maybe I’ll inherit the neuropathy. Maybe both. Maybe neither.








  • Same, especially because I’m a frequent sky-looker but have to prepare any ride-along that all we’re going to see by eye is pale fuzzy blobs. All my camera is going to show you tonight is pale sprindly clouds. I think it’s neat as hell I can use some $150 binoculars to find interstellar objects, but many people are bored by the lack of Hubble-quality sights on tap. Like… Yes, and then sent a telescope to space in order to get those images.

    That being said, I once had the opportunity to see the Orion nebula through a ~30" reflector at an Observatory, and damn. I got to eyeball about what my camera can do in a single frame with perfect tracking and settings.


  • unfortunately, the study included information about intensity of night time light but did not included information about the sources of light

    So I guess it’s user-interpreted intensity

    For heart attack, for example, compared with those in the darkest 50th percentile, those who experienced some nighttime light — in the 51st to 70th percentile — had a 20 percent increased risk of heart attack.

    Those who experienced more light, in the 71st to 90th percentile, had a 27 percent increased risk.

    And those who experienced the most nighttime light, in the 91st to 100th percentile, had a 47 percent higher risk.





  • Anyone with a full brain knows that putting scientific phrasing into layman’s conversation conveys a much dumber message than is intended. “scientists assume…” yes because without making assumptions, they’ll never calculate anything. Assumptions get tweaked as evidence is presented. “Scientists can’t explain why…” scientists do not have a foolproof explanation. They have theories that are likely and make sense, bit nobody knows for absolutely certain that it’s true and extremely accurate. “Historians don’t know what happened…” because they weren’t there, but they probably have some good ideas.