• Big Tech has implemented passkeys in a way that locks users into their platforms rather than providing universal security
  • Passkeys were developed to replace passwords for better account security, but their rollout by Apple and Google has limited their potential
  • Proton Pass offers passkeys that are universal, easy to use, and available to everyone for improved online security and privacy.
  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    258 months ago

    The way Apple or companies like Paypal implement two-factor authentication, let alone passkeys, drive me up the wall. This all could have been so much better.

    I’m not even going to mention all the platforms that rolled out passkey creation support, but not passkey login support, for whichever damn reason

    • plz1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      248 months ago

      Yeah, Apple 2FA is infuriating, especially since you can do all factors from the same device. Kind of defeats the purpose of traditional 2FA/MFA. Also, companies that decide you 2FA experience has to use their app, instead of a standards-compliant TOTP app of your choosing…ugh.

      • @WolfLink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        188 months ago

        Traditional 2FA (assuming you mean apps with codes) can be done from the same device (if you have the app with the codes installed on that device).

        It doesn’t defeat the purpose of 2FA. The 2 factors are 1. The password and 2. You are in possession of a device with the 2FA codes. The website doesn’t know about the device until you enter the code.

        • plz1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Yeah my point is it does not protect the local device well. It does protect well from remote compromise though.

      • paraphrand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If you think forcing everyone to carry an object other than their phone around so they can use 2factor on their phone is a good idea… Or if you said I need to go to my laptop when I’m logging in on my phone and vise versa… that’s nonsense too. Sure maybe some companies require this. But that’s different.

        Authy on my phone is just as “dumb” as Keychain on my phone.

        How else are you imagining this should work? Keep in mind normal people need to do it too.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          For Apple, it’s your iCloud account that everything depends on, and it’s the weakest point. Not by itself maybe, but in practice there needs to be a way to reset your iCloud password, even without your phone. Currently I believe that’s just an Apple representative asking life questions, but that information is mostly publicly available. There needs to be a better way.

          A physical 2fa device may be just what we need to securely rest our iCloud passwords, keeping everything else more secure

          • paraphrand
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            That’s a fair point. iCloud Keychain is a single point of failure.

        • plz1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          If I’m on my laptop, and the 2fa code shows on that same laptop, it defeats the purpose of it. The point is sortation of security privileges, ask this just adds more work while providing no less security to the device. It does protect you from remote compromise, though.

          • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            It doesn’t defeat the purpose of it, as you indicate, it can protect from remote attacks.

            • @AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              Also most or all of these should require some for of local authentication.

              For example I have 2fa apps on my phone, where I need to use them, so yes, that’s less than ideal. However

              • it protects against remote attacks
              • it protects against SIM attacks
              • and even if someone stole my phone and unlocked it, they’d still need my face id for every use
      • @9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The factors are:

        • Something you have
        • Something you are
        • Something you know

        Here the password is something you know and the device is something you have (typically also protected by something you are, like your fingerprint or face)

        Someone with your phone but no password or fingerprint is SOL. Someone with your password but not your phone also SOL

    • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      PayPal for sure, because at one point they actually removed the ability to use a hardware mfa token.

      A little known fact about iCloud is that you can use hardware MFA tokens. I think this feature was just recently released though. They force you to enroll at least two tokens too, which is a nice safety. I set this up about a month ago and it’s been great.

  • @CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    328 months ago

    When vaultwarden supports this I’ll play ball. If I don’t have control over my authentication methods, then they aren’t my authentication methods.

      • dantheclamman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Still waiting for the mobile app. Maybe the firefox addon would work, but would prefer the app

  • My Password Is 1234
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I noticed that recently every post on Proton’s blog has been an advertisement of their services.

    They are hypocrites.

    A few days ago they posted that corporations are bad because they collect fingerprints, profile users, etc., yet they are no better, as their mobile apps rely on Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) owned by Google to deliver notifications to their users.

    In 2020 they wrote that they “may offer alternative push notification system”, but apparently shitting on corporations is easier than making actual changes. Four years ago.

  • capital
    link
    fedilink
    English
    478 months ago

    If I can’t add your passkey to my Bitwarden vault, I’m not using your passkey.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -78 months ago

          That’s with hosting your own server. Unfortunately I only discovered this paywall after sending them $10 out of good will.

          Of course it’s open source, so it’s certainly possible to break their DRM, and if it were something less sensitive I would.

          I still might, but VaultWarden looks like a better alternative.

  • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    328 months ago

    Proton Pass offers passkeys that are universal, easy to use, and available to everyone for improved online security and privacy.

    I wonder if there could be any bias in Proton claiming their product is the best

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      I’d trust them miles before Google or Apple. Hell, they dropped the prices on some of their products when they found ways to provide them cheaper. Proton is a good company.

      • @vermyndax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        That doesn’t mean they will be around forever. Economic realities care little about whether a company is good or not.

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          True, but this is valid for every company.
          Let’s say that since the company is Swiss based and, AFAIK, not quoted maybe they are not driven by the “the next quarter is all that matters” mentality of many quoted (US) companies.
          There is a smaller chance that they will do something stupid to monetize more just to be ok next quarter (while risking to lose everything the next one) and will be there as long as they provide a value to the customer for the paid price.

    • @asmoranomar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      From my understanding it’s the concept of trust. Basic passwords are complete trust that both ends are who they say they are, on a device that is trusted, and passing the password over the wire is sufficient and nobody else tries to violate that trust. Different types of techniques over time have been designed to reduce that level of trust and at a fundamental level, passkeys are zero trust. This means you don’t even trust your own device (except during the initial setup) and the passkey you use can only be used on that particular device, by a particular user, with a particular provider, for a particular service, on their particular hardware…etc. If at any point trust is broken, authentication fails.

      Remember, this is ELI5, the whole thing is more complex. It’s all about trust. HOW this is done and what to do when it fails is way beyond EIL5. Again, this is from my own understanding, and the analogy of hardware passwords isn’t too far off.

  • @alsu2launda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    278 months ago

    Not surprised,

    Google too nowadays.

    There’s a reason why they removed their company motto “Don’t be Evil”

  • @elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    328 months ago

    I am not using passkeys until it’s possible to easily migrate them between providers (not just devices / browsers). If I used Proton Pass, and then later decided to use another password manager, could I export my passkey data?

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      Proton Pass allow you to export your passwords in various formats (both plain and encrypted). That you are able to import somewhere else is not something Proton Pass can guarantee but you have your data.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168 months ago

    Lock downs are pretty much a hard pass for me. Anything I buy, I research, and if there’s even the slightest hint of BS incompatibility, it’s simply a no go.

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not commenting on the merits of the blogpost’s arguments, but Proton is selling their own product here too

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 months ago

      Proton enabled passkeys in their free tier. So ultimately, yes by using their free tier and being safe in the thought that you can always leave if you want, that might drive you to pay for a paid plan.

      But companies trying to earn your business by offering you a good honest product is not at all the same as a company using anti-consumer practices to keep you from leaving lol.

    • @StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      288 months ago

      And if you believe in our mission and want to help us build a better internet where privacy is the default, you can sign up for a paid plan to get access to even more premium features.

      Translation: don’t give those other guys money, give us your money!

      • Encrypt-Keeper
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Well no, their call to action isn’t to not give anyone else money. They didn’t have anything negative to say about their competition like 1Password. They’re just warning you about the shady things Google and Apple are doing specifically. And as an alternative they’re offering their own solution instead, which also doesn’t cost any money.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      As someone who is not familiar with photon, I love to see a vendor presenting a feature with a technical discussion, even if they’re also selling it. As far as I can tell, no one was hiding intent, no one was directly selling, so “well done”. Or maybe I just agree with the premise, I dunno

      • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        People getting their accounts compromised leads to spam email, spam comments, fake crypto livestreams, etc that impact others. Google definitely has an interest in preventing people from getting their accounts compromised and not just for the benefit of the individuals with the accounts but their platforms as a whole.

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Google pushed email accounts to you, do you not have an email address either?

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not locked into Gmail: I know it implements standards and I choose it as long as it is most convenient.

        A lot of what comes into my gmail account is actually addressed to various aliases from various providers, and I can point those aliases anywhere

        In particular, all my recent online accounts use unique generated email addresses that I can disable at will, and that forward to my actual email

        • Encrypt-Keeper
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Well that’s great news, then you’ll like passkeys because you can use them without being locked into anything.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      A lot of my hesitation is that not only are passkeys being pushed by the big vendors AND they seem to have a less than portable implementation BUT ALSO they don’t seem to give enough details. Everything is dumbed down for the less technical until it means nothing

      I like that this thread already has more actual information than all the outreach of the big vendors over months

  • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -5
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    told ya so, i got downvoted for being skeptical of this shit.

    if google or similar is pushing it, is should NOT be trusted! lets NOT, please!

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      You still deserve those downvotes. There’s nothing to not trust about passkeys.

      • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        theres google, give me an alternative not exclusively controlled by oligarchs and i will consider it.

        • Encrypt-Keeper
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Not sure what Google has to do with passkeys besides the fact that they’ve implemented them. Google implemented passwords too but I’m guessing you’re fine with those?

          Passkeys are not exclusively controlled by oligarchs so I guess by your own admission you should consider them.

            • Encrypt-Keeper
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              Well you’re in luck, they’re currently established and working in practice.