• Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    25 days ago

    As it should. If it’s a product, then it’s Google’s faulty product. If they try to pull some shit that AI has agency, personhood or is a legal individual then they should slap google on the account of the applicable slave labor law.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    It is the company’s own content. They are running the LLM and the LLM is just a tool with no responsibility on its own. If the tool is unreliable that is Google’s problem.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    25 days ago

    Just the right consequence. Your system with your programming produces output that you are fully responsible for.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      Stupid on its face. The whole compromise was that search engines were just indexes and so not necissarily responsible for what they link users too (within limits), and websites encourage their bot because it sends them traffic.

      Then they blow that all up with a “summary” no one asked for.