Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I love the “just fork it” argument.

      Look, Elon, maybe we can’t solo a project like that if we’re still using old hardware, okay?

      Sorry if that made you frown behind your shades. Ask the poolside waiter for a other cocktail.

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, most of the success of Linux comes from the freedom to solve local issues the way you want.

        There have come lots of issues solved with a departure from the project from a need that drove the change. Want Debian without systemd? Devuan.

        So yes, literally, if it’s important to you, you can fork it. Whether that takes a big lift or not doesn’t mean you’re any less free to do so.

    • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The fairy tale of fork freedom, just like the fairy tale of market freedom.

      Y’all are really pathetic.