• antonim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    “We have heard a range of views from staff, including concerns from those who have felt pressured to support union efforts and those who are confused by the unionization process,” the foundation added in a frequently asked questions section. “We have also seen a misunderstanding around what the union can do for global staff and Wikimedia movement communities.”

    LMAO, fuck off with this bullshit. I noticed WMF spokepersons love this vocabulary, everyone except for them is “confused”, if you disagree with WMF’s actions it’s just a “misunderstanding”.

    • khepri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oh that is just standard copy straight out of the union-busting playbook. In law you would call it “preserving the objection” which basically means they know it’s BS but at least if they don’t back down from it they can burn more time and money because now the process has to accommodate for all this “pressure” “confusion” and “misunderstanding” that po’ 'ol liddle Wikimedia just can’t make sense of.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wikimedia Foundation announced it would not voluntarily recognize the union

    Surprise, surprise. Of course not, unless there is explicit law requiring them to do so.

    I mean, what did they expect? Normal case is that they have to fight and win first.

    • Tonuka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well you have to wonder if at a support so high Wikimedia couldn’t skip the “fight and win” stage to earn some goodwill which might get them more favourable terms. In open confrontation, everyone loses. Takes energy away from everything else and generates a ton of bad publicity.