Kinda hard to read even for an experienced IT pro.

But some great insights.

How long until he will start to prefer only 1 of the AI companies, and call all the others enemies?

Maybe he could sleep in the factory for a few weekends? P

“If someone is so thin-skinned that they cannot tolerate this sculpture being exhibited in the European Parliament, then they have no place on the world stage,” Clausen said.

I like this attitude a lot.

What we should do IMHO:

Make the owner of an AI legally responsible for the actions of their AI system, but not legal owners of the AI system’s results/products.

We all want the problems solved, right? Is there a wrong way to solve them?

Science is not mainly about solving problems (that would be engineering for example).

But more specifically to your question:

There are many wrong ways of doing scientific work, and what current AI does is one of them: reading it all, rephrasing it all a little and then already declare everything as done & good, even when it isn’t.

A scientist needs proof, and peer reviews, etc. before the work can be called good.

Never forget AI isn’t creating really new things, it can only chew up and spit out what has been there before. This is especially true in science.

Stealing from all the world and then bragging boldly about it.

Is that the new accepted behaviour?

The next ruler of the world?

Windows can still create an additional short 8.3 alias for a long file name.

O.m.g.

They should have removed this ancient handbrake long ago. Now I learn that it not just still exists, but is also still engaged by default.

I could live with that.

First Usa has sailed further and further away from it’s allies and from the whole “western” world.

Now they look at us and recognize that we are far away?

The charming part: it wouldn’t be me against Mr Recorder-user, but the public against Mr Recorder-user, and then I would be the witness.

It’s not recording. Here is the privacy paper

If it takes the audio and sends it to anywhere (for example to the nearest iphone), then nobody needs to ask anymore what they call it in their fancy papers 😉

In practice you need to either disallow people entering private rooms or force them to take off

Well, I could do that anyway but that’s not what the law is about.

The law says, who uses such a device in a private room (restroom, bedroom), goes to jail for several years.

So it doesn’t need me to tell that person “do not enter” or anything.

There is another law (harder to explain in foreign language) that forbids to create or have (!) any devices that do recording and telecommunication but look like something else.

That makes them extremely illegal devices in private rooms.

(German law)

the parental control […] could almost entirely control the car, including its speed

They assume kids in the driver seat who need to be controlled? How weird is that??

A living dog isn’t that easy to fool. There is a dead object moving, like a falling broomstick, or any other of the human’s toys.

via the web at muse.ai

a small bug, because surely it must read muse.um

/s

Was Barbara involved, or did they just fear her?

and OpenAI Thinks It May Kick Off the AGI Era

Oh? Finally? Wasn’t it the same with the last one already? And the one before…

Why does it remind me of Jehovah’s witnesses and the end of the world?

It was obvious and proven already a few years ago:

CEOs are the first and most easy ones to replace by AI.