• @blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 months ago

    Eli5 please… in lieu of US trust busting, couldn’t literally any government entity like the EU, where msft etc Al do business, have stopped this acquisition? How did this happen in the first place?

    • @pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      Well I for one am shocked to see a megacap do significant layoffs after M&A, talk about breaking with tradition!

  • @secundnature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    195 months ago

    They talk about broken promises and misrepresentation of what they would do after the merger. Corporations aren’t people and don’t have morals to stop them from breaking promises or just flat out lying. The only way they will do anything is if it makes them money or they are forced (regulated)

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Corporations aren’t people and don’t have morals to stop them from breaking promises or just flat out lying

      I think this is pure bullshit. In the end corporation are guided by people, who make decision and have a clear chain of command. When a corporation promise something, there are people behind that signed off the promise.

      And you can punish a corporation by simply punishing the people who sign off what the corporatoion does, at any level. I mean, it is good to be the CEO and get the big bucks, fine, but if the corporation you are CEO of does something wrong it is your responsability to fix it and take the punishment for it.

      • @secundnature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There aren’t laws saying the company had to tell the truth, so if they lie, what’s the punishment?

        Edit: also, wouldn’t the power to punish them have to come from some sort of law or regulation? 🤔

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          There aren’t laws saying the company had to tell the truth, so if they lie, what’s the punishment?

          Try to sign a contract (as company) lying about your obligations as see how it work.

          What is missing is the will to punish them.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I agree with you, but the organizations clearly have no morals. If you want to infer that means the boardroom occupants are a bunch of ghouls then sure. But we haven’t meaningfully held an executive to account for a corporation’s actions for a long time. The end effect is a sociopathic pursuit of money.

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          But we haven’t meaningfully held an executive to account for a corporation’s actions for a long time.

          That’s exactly the problem but it not the same than saying “Corporations aren’t people and don’t have morals”.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            Where’s the morality then? What have they done for their employees and customers that wasn’t forced by law?

            • gian
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Nothing. Which is what is showing that companies could be punished for not following the laws.

  • Vaderhoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    365 months ago

    I don’t think I’ve seen a game studio acquisition happen without layoffs of some sort. Doesn’t make it right, but it does seem like a horrible routine.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t think I’ve seen a game studio acquisition happen without layoffs of some sort. Doesn’t make it right, but it does seem like a horrible routine.

      It really depends on if the layoffs were done because they were duplicate people for the same job position, versus clearing house so that the stockholders are happier by having better profits.

    • @dunestorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Yeah but 1,900 staff, come the fuck on that’s a mass exodus not a layoff. I’m in a company of 300+ people and it’s a HUGE number of people, I can hardly process over 6x as many layoffs…

      • Vaderhoff
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Oh absolutely agreed. It just sucks that this isn’t unusual, no matter how small or great the number. Hope the peeps get snatched up by better studios

  • Vaderhoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    185 months ago

    This also pretty shitty on account that Kotick initiated loads of layoffs just before acquisition talks were even public. This is usual practice to make the company seem more valuable.

  • @LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -25 months ago

    I’m guessing because they haven’t been paid their share of the profits and savings. FTC only cares about themselves nothing more.

  • @BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    Like when do big mergers like this not end in layoffs? The redundancy in management wouldn’t make sense. Like what does the FTC think Microsoft was going to do? 😆

    • @Sacha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      It was more than just managers and redundant positions that were laid off. And it was mostly blizzard employees laid off specifically.

      Also

      /no please don’t attack this innocent multi trillion dollar company