• talos@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I also don’t get it. How many people realistically only use their desktop PC for gaming and what’s the benefit of using a “gaming” distro if the same can be achieved with minimal amount on a more versatile distro?

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m not sure if CachyOS counts as a “gaming” distro or not, but I use that on my desktop/work machine. I’m pretty familiar with Arch (BTW) and I can do a manual setup from scratch if I need to (that’s what my laptop runs) but Cachy just seemed like a way to use Arch with a simple setup and a bunch of default optimizations. So tl;dr laziness I guess lol.

    • some_random_nick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      How many people realistically only uses their desktop PC for gaming […].

      The majority? Not everyone can or wants to afford 10 gaming gadgets just to play the same games on different devices.

      what’s the benefit of using a “gaming” distro

      There are some benefits. (I haven’t and don’t plan on watching the video, so I don’t know which they used.) CachyOS has some optimized kernels that help squeeze out more performance out of latency sensitive games. It is not earth-shattering, but there are measurable differences. One personal example was CS2. It ran fine on Fedora 42, but on Cachy there was noticeable less stutter when there was a lot of action.

      • talos@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess then we agree? Not many people can afford dedicate devices for just one use case, so a PC, in most instances will also be used for other use cases than gaming.

        Thanks for the reasons for dedicated gaming distros, I wasn’t aware of those.