• Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    To everyone thinking this is a uniquely mean thing. Its a trend at the moment for people to “fent lean” to mock americans. It doesnt matter if its mean to fent addicts they got bigger problems and dont care about kids on tiktok. It hurts Americans because they KNOW its a problem and they are ashamed and they want people to either pretend it doesnt exist or pretend to care because thats what they’re doing(generalization). Its a great attack on Americans IMO.

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It hurts Americans because they KNOW its a problem and they are ashamed

      You’re off your rocker if you think Americans spend much time feeling embarrassed about its tiny number of fentanyl addicts.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those would fit into the camp of Americans that pretend it doesnt exist and they dont like being reminded that it does exist and its an American problem.

        Look at your comment for example, its not a tiny amount of fent addicts, your streets are full of them. I went to LA Precovid and it was disgusting people seeing people drugged out living on the streets being treated like its normal. There were 500k people homeless at that time, now there are 800k. You cannot sit here and say thats normal or say its only a tiny amount. Fent deaths have more than doubled since then homelessness is on the rise, drug use is on the rise.

        • ronl2k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          its not a tiny amount of fent addicts, your streets are full of them.

          False. You’re making up stuff and have probably never been to America.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Americans seem completely fine with mocking and insulting Russians, Israelis and others, but when someone mocks Americans, all of a sudden it’s inappropriate to make fun of the general population for their government’s actions.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    American here. The US fully deserves to be mocked, blocked, ridiculed, and shunned.

    I’m a Democratic Socialist, and have never voted for a Republican in my life. I’m as stuck with this BS as are the Britons who didn’t vote for Brexit. I laughed at the Brits while Trump was in his first term saying, “At least our fuck-up will be gone in four years.”

    D’oh!

  • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Among all the things you can mock the USA for, this is probably pretty low on the list …

    Besides, King Trump would love to throw addicts in camps. Only the poor ones, obviously.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Would be more accurate to act like they have diabetes but not everyone is a good an actor as Brendan Fraser.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Mock the US for being dumb… that’s fair. Fentanyl addicts are typically victims of the system though. You’re mocking the wrong part.

  • vdbm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Here is a Google translated interview with the Greenlandic MP Aki-Matilda Høegh-Dam (member of both the Danish and Greenlandic Parliament) in the Italian magazine Espresso today (original here).

    Below my reaction:

    "Her discourse is very nationalistic, heavily anchored in Greenland’s colonial history, with a strong sense of recourse for wrongs received. She clearly has a painful tooth, which transmits throughout the interview.

    While agreeing in principle (colonialism is indeed a deep wound and injustice, and Danes - I know since I lived there - can still be arrogant notwithstanding the Jante Law), she has to make a choice and face the reality of Greenland’s extremely tiny population, similar to that of the small Italian city of Cuneo, therefore of an extremely limited amount of people to be able to act convincingly on an international level.

    Greenlandic citizens have at the moment a Danish passport, not a Greenlandic one, therefore they are EU citizens (which she doesn’t mention) while not being part of the EU (which she does), but part of NATO (she mentions this at well).

    Are they more protected as EU citizens (with Danish or perhaps Greenlandic passports in the future) or as US citizens (as a territory, which - let’s be real - excludes voting representation in the U.S. Federal government)?

    In the end her discourse emphasizes the fact that the dignity of Greenlandic people ought to be recognized, but what if the other future partner/owner couldn’t care less?

    I am afraid the Greenlandic people are no stronger internationally (and with regards to the US in particular) than the much larger population of Gaza.

    They (the Greenlandic people) will just as easily be ignored and abused in this new US setup as the Gazans are right now and as Greenlanders were historically in the Danish setup (perhaps no longer right now, although some Danish condescension remains).

    Many Greenlanders are now considering emigration (moving to Denmark mainly) or simply being sidelined. It is not the moment, I am afraid, for Greenlanders to just adhere to principles, but to simply chose the best option available, while heavily insisting on those results that can be achieved in a very short time period (to avoid being on the menu of the 250th birthday party of the Declaration of Independence on 4 July 2026).

    The best thing they could do is to align themselves with Iceland (population 5 to 6 times larger than that of Greenland but facing unfortunately analogous challenges), Canada (same as far as the challenges are concerned) and the EU, and insist on actions on those levels, which she isn’t doing.

    I am concerned that her position might be noble in principle, but disastrous in reality."

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You should look up conservative “humor” some time, 98% of it is going after trans people, minorities, drug addicts, poor people, anyone they see as less then. You might find it really funny.

        Going after marginalized people isn’t the own you think it is.

          • ronl2k@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That would have a chance of being true only if fentanyl was a specifically American problem. Drug abuse is a problem in most free countries, and with some countries that are not free.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Mocking drug addicts isn’t going after all of American society. Do you think Charlie Kirk was going after all of American society when he did the same thing?

            Its like trying to mock Europeans by doing racism against Roma people. Its not criticizing all of European society, you’re literally doing the same shit our conservatives do.

            When you mock the victims of a school shooting, you’re not criticizing all of American society or system that creates school shooters, you’re just being a reactionary piece of shit, and we have enough of those.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                That’s exactly the difference, because that would be focusing on the system victimizing the children, rather than mocking the children themselves for getting shot.

                Hell you could genuinely do the children getting shot as a satire of conservatives’ lack of response to school shootings, but that would be mocking conservatives, not the victims.

                Its not that any group is off limits, its the actual message can’t just be “haha <oppressed minority> bad”

                • Children scared for their lives living in fear is funny to you? You sicko don’t make fun of the victims!

                  You’re just choosing arbitrarily what to take offense at. America’s self inflicted opiate problem is just as ridiculous as it’s self inflicted school shooting problem. Bringing it back to American political parties is missing the entire point. It’s America, not the Republicans threatening world order. It’s America’s obsession with capitalism that prevents them from fixing their problems.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree, pretty shit to use people who are under incredible suffering as a joke prop :|