• @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 months ago

    I’ve said this for years as others online have claimed OF is so safe. You don’t know the full story. It is not necessarily a more ethical business model than traditional porn

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s definitely more ethical in that it allows the creators to get more of the money.

      But that doesn’t mean there aren’t issues. Clearly it doesn’t fix the whole issue of people under 18 sometimes making their way into the industry. It’s not a silver bullet that fixes an entire (sometimes problematic) industry.

      I don’t know who was trying to tell you that OF solves everything about the porn industry, there would be no further issues, and that we’d live happily ever after, but that was obviously never going to be the case.

      • @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        OF take 30% I think. What does an average scene make on OF? How does that compare to the pay rate for old school porn?

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think receiving 70% of the prices that you yourself set and deem acceptable is likely better than ?% of whatever PornHub or XHamster say they made from your video predominantly through ad revenue.

          At the very least, it gives creators a great amount more control. In terms of setting prices, in terms of creating content they want to make as opposed to what a production company says, in terms of how you want to advertise, in terms of whether you want to lock your content behind a paid tier or not, etc.

          And 30% is also pretty standard. Google, Apple, Valve, etc all charge 30%. Shit, on twitch it’s 50% IIRC. I’m not saying it’s perfect and couldn’t be cheaper, but it’s the usual market rate.

    • @Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      The main thing I’m getting from the article is that adults who try to profit from abusing children on OnlyFans get arrested.

        • @Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          It seems to me that OnlyFans takes several steps that make it easier for police and prosecutors to do their job, some of which are detailed in the article. What additional steps do you think they should take?

          • @jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            None. My point is that there’s a shit ton of abuse out there. Only a tiny amount is caught

            You said the people who do this get arrested. But they don’t. Only a tiny fraction get caught and arrested

            • @Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              I guess I’m thinking about this from a solutions-oriented mindset: what concrete, achievable steps can various entities take to reduce child abuse? For an adult content platform, the identity verification steps OnlyFans uses seem reasonable; even when an offender uses an account owned by someone else, that often provides enough of a lead for investigators.