YouTube is increasing Premium prices in multiple countries, right after an ad-blocker crackdown | You either pay rightfully for the video content you consume, or you live with the ads.::Google is increasing the prices of YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions in some regions, right after blocking ad-blockers.

  • @InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    I still maintain that YT Premium is a great service if you’re like a lot of people and YT is the majority of your online video consumption. From a price to use comparison standpoint, it’s unbeaten. Netflix, Hulu, Crunchyroll, etc all pale in comparison.

    But their insistence on bumping up prices, bundling YT Music and their war on ad blockers now is making it really hard to try to keep it. Hopefully now that Google is trying to cash in, we get some real competitors. Because right now when it comes to the sheer amount of content, visual quality and reliability of streaming nothing compares.

  • @WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    I was honestly thinking about buying premium, so I would support the creators. Welp, that’s out of the window.

  • @set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    mine went from 17 AUD to 33 AUD.

    what a bunch of greedy assholes.

    I was paying for it for years. But now I’ll go out of my way to not pay for it. No doubt a lot of people will too.

    • @pandacoder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      TF? (aka fuck’em) That seems like the USD price is probably going to rise too then. USD 9.99 right now for me and that’s AUD 15.41.

      AUD 33 would be more than doubling it for me, just like Disney more than doubled my barely used subscription (I instantly cancelled that).

      One Piece is going to have real live action now methinks.

  • @nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    Still haven’t gotten any on Firefox with Ublock Origin. The usual explanation is that it rolls out in stages, but I’ve nothing weeks later.

    • @BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      They know nobody else will use it if they don’t

      Just wait, it’s google. They’ll sunset google music and not bring the price down

      • @hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Honestly I think Google has a horrible management culture. It worked fine when they were printing money regardless but at this point the incompetence is starting to show.

  • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I will be stone cold dead before I pay a single dollar/euro to Google for THEM to harvest MY DATA to resell.

  • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    uBlock beat the filters almost immediately. Annoyingly for google once you’ve downloaded something its out of their hands.

    • @DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      How? I keep having to clear cookies. Now use Firefox. With logged in window I find the video I want and I open it in private window with ublock origin enabled. No warning in private logged out window.

  • @Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22 years ago

    Seems like this could be turned around if enough people would just consciously refuse to patronize anything they saw advertised on youtube.

    • @zombieshotgun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      That seems like it could work, and I would love to say you’re right, but many of the companies advertising—especially as we’re seeing more and more of the big players—have a really diverse ad spend budget so their dollars are all over the place. Because so many ads aren’t looking for a direct sale but rather increase your awareness when you DO want to buy, say, laundry detergent, there’s no way to tie your purchase to having seen an ad (though marketers LOVE to try and draw lines to efforts, many are hazy at best). So seeing ads and consciously not buying what you’re seeing could in theory lead to a dip in sales, but the watch numbers are high, so no adveriser would be able to tell that dip is because of youtube, or podcasts or… uh… radio?.

      So sadly the best way to hurt the system is to a) keep blocking the ads so the watch level is low and the advertisers want out or b) drop the watch level naturally by picking another platform.

      Source: a lot of time in advertising.

  • Punkie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    The stupid thing is that they could have approached this in a much less dickish manner. Seriously. First, they are making money off us as it is with their demographics and the fact they are not utilizing this cash cow as before means they have gotten too greedy for their own good, or mismanaging funds which is a completely unrelated problem. Long ads, unskippable ads, expensive premium. This is the beginning of the end of something they used to offer as free, resting on their laurels as a monopoly, like the airline industry. When they are now practically forcing the cobra effect. Eventually, it will get so silly, it will go the way of the dod like Angelfire. AOL, and Geocities. Or, soon, Netflix.

    I would have started it similar to Patreon, like, “by donating $1/mo, you can support artists like this,” and incentivize the publishers with monetary gain and higher search results. Nobody is gonna miss $1 or $12/year. You multiply that by millions of viewers, that’s millions of dollars on top of their demographics. Second, they could have had a 5 second bumper, similar to PBS, like “This and other find content is brought to you by Exxon and the Chubb group” or whatever. Five seconds. Front and back. Not enough to cause outrage. Skippable, but not so annoying, everyone skips.

  • @daniskarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    If some day I cannot block ads on YouTube I’ll go to Patreon or any other platform that gives creators a real share of what I’m paying. Google will not see my money.

    • @AliceTheMinotaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Only issue would be getting the creators to move. That nay be more difficult than said with some. I already follow some on rumble, I only stay on YouTube as others haven’t.

      Otherwise I agree

    • @Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      Has YouTube even done anything to improve the platform in the last 8 year? The only thing that I’ve seen change is the search turning to trash with “recommended content” after 4 real search results.

    • @cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I was under the impression that YT Premium paid creators the same per view as YT with ads. Is this not the case?

      • @Stephen304@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I believe Louis Rossmann said that giving a single dollar directly to a creator is more than a lifetime of watching their ads. Premium I think is really good comparatively but that’s only because ads pay so little.

        (https://youtu.be/4Q3ZXQZZlcE?t=55 is where he says this according to his cpm)

      • @SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Some creators have said that the cut they get from premium viewers is higher than that of ad based (SpiffingBrit for example, in his YouTube download exploit video).

        If that still holds true is unknown.

      • @theRealBassist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I don’t believe so. As I understand it, all Premium money goes into a big bucket. Then, views/watchtime/etc. are used to calculate what percentage of the pie a given creator will receive.

  • @xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    If ads werent accompanied by malware, scams and right wing propaganda farms I might have considered not blocking them but as it is, no.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The right-wing propaganda thing has been odd for me. I’m a liberal gun nut and watch tons of gun related stuff. You would think I would be run over by BS, but I’m not. Can’t explain it.

      OTOH, if one has a soft mind, I can see the rabbit holes they might fall into. Perhaps we shore up education so even the idiots know enough not to fall in?