• brb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I never understood why anyone would use Brave, the payouts are small, the utility of the crypto is zero, and watching/seeing adverts is a nightmare. I honestly believe that blocking all advertising and sending a small monetary amount to someone providing value is a better way of supporting the people you care about.

      • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I used it for the perceived level of privacy they pretended to offer. Guess I’m switching to Firefox tomorrow.

        • ???@lemmy.worldBannedBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep, exactly my thought too. I’ve made too many hops but none of these products truly offer privacy.

          I moved from Telegram to Signal for security only to learn more and more about the holes in Signal. At least Proton Mail is fine.

        • di5ciple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You can use pihole and route your traffic there with a vpn such as tailscale to block ads and more

    • BeardyGrumps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I thought it was supposed to be the best privacy browser but after reading these comments my view has changed completely and have switched all devices to Firefox.

    • Divus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I made roughly $1200 using Brave at work.

      It is optional to open the ad or not and you do get paid half what you would even if you don’t view the ad. I turned on max number of adds per hour and clicked no most of the time. Took me maybe 10 seconds per hour while I was getting paid to work already. Sure the per ad money got poor over time, but at first it wasn’t so bad at first and I was making a couple bucks per day. Converted that to Bitcoin every month and that has nearly doubled in price. So if I converted to USD right now I’m at $1200 for a grand total of under 9 hours worth of work over 1.5 years. So my hourly pay plus clicking no to the ad I made $166 a hour on average.

      My company’s software stopped working with Brave about half a year ago and now I use Firefox.

  • sophs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Brave is just too shady and I hate that it’s considered a “privacy” browser by people who don’t know better.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      Brave is just too shady

      It’s amazing how so few people seem to understand that Brave’s entire business model is an extortion racket wrapped in a crypto scam.

      Of course, both that and the new bullshit described in this article is all just par for the course from the guy who (a) inflicted the abomination that is Javascript upon the world, and (b) got booted from Mozilla for being a bigot.

      • grissee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I love how you added yellow border for clarity

        (I’ve screenshotted lemmy comments before and it looks utterly confusing without border lol)

    • theonetruedroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      I used Brave for a out 6 months, but I’m really turned off by the devs. I switch to FF and am loving it. It’s much improved from when I last used in decades ago.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a shame that there isn’t a good alternative for Apple devices, though. iOS doesn’t have much by the way of good ad blockers.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s a shame that there isn’t a good alternative for Apple devices, though. iOS doesn’t have much by the way of good ad blockers Apple infringes on your property rights by refusing to relinquish control of your device to you, the owner, even after they “sold” it to you.

        FTFY.

        • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          A little agressive, but yes, they dont reliquish access to your devce after purchase. “Calling home” being the catch-all term for devices that are fully or parially sending requests to its true owners for commands to run or data to give.

    • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Brendan Eich, the guy who co-founded Firefox and developed Javascript, is the CEO of Brave. His politics aside, I think he’s a pretty trustworthy guy.

      • IriYan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I hate to burst your bubble but when it comes to 6-7digits of cash at stake what does “trustworthy” even mean? You mean between millions and his word to you he will choose his word? His previously stated values and principles?

        The guy who made waterfox seemed pretty nice, friendly, committed to the cause, then sold the project to a data-miner, and so did the honest people who made startpage, the trustworthy privacy minded search engine? Now they see waterfox is independent again and not part of the big multi-natinal data miner.

        Mozilla once again made a sudden change that breaks your previous profile or other functionality and if you dare roll back the upgrade your profile has been ruined in transition, so you are forced to start from scratch reconfiguring, setting up you std tabs, bookmarks, history … Same stuff with TB, addons/plugins disabled, new “features” added, whether you trust them or not, added dependencies … you roll back you lose.

        The google chrome-engine is so intrusive in the way it runs, degoogled or not, it is hell to have on a system. Maybe inside a vm without anything else other than specific browser session may be ?ok? for fluff work, nothing private I hope.

        The naivity of people to accept and sometimes welcom large corporations producing FOSS is what got us to this mess, and I don’t mean users, but devs, distro managers, … if it is legally FOSS it is OK, even if it is a huge trojan horse manufactured by corporations to penetrate an other wise safe and secure system. FOSS - no corporate involvement - may be it, but will it boot? LinFound. gets millions and millions to have board seats to influence kernel, and it seems to be dancing with their wishes.

        • EthicalAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think FOSS is enough because as long as you can fully read the code, it can be audited and even forked to remove BS. So I’m fine with companies developing FOSS. I don’t even really care about EEE. We can always maintain a fork of the standard at the moment you fucked with it. We can even still get your upstream changes just with the shit cherry picked out! It’s always a win.

          • IriYan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Have you audited any of it? Would you like to try gcc or systemd for that matter? By the time you go through 1% of it the code has changed already. How many times in the past years has tremendous security breaches been caused by FOSS and was discovered months after it was in effect, and some of this by coincidence, or corporate teams that review code.

            • EthicalAI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              The fact I haven’t doesn’t mean I can’t read auditors who have, who do keep track of these changes. Zero days are usually caused by things no one noticed, not things that were intentionally added by corporate overlords to spy or back door a FOSS app.

              • IriYan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Speck was pushed and provided by Google to linux, they added the content to the kernel having your naive belief, it was later found containing a backdoor to ALL systems, and Google raised their hands up and said it was passed to us by NSA. Is this what happened? Or did I dream all this up?

                Facebook provided 0 FOSS, not a bit, suddenly they make an algorithm they “bought” including the author, and make it foss, to build it it needs google software, like a bush fire more than half of distributions adopt it and all data provided as comparative to xz are false, based on poor use of xz to make zstd appear better, while still admitting zstd can never attain the level of compression, but it is fast (ONLY when xz is run on a single thread while zstd is multithread by default). They claim xz sums are different when run on 1 cpu or many, still not true.

                Just wait for that bomb to explode, the guy who wrote the code for zstd doesn’t seem possible to have enough knowledge to write it, he appears as a front for something.

                Things that smell like shit don’t have to be actually tasted to be called shit.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Brendan Eich, the guy who… developed Javascript

        You say that as if it’s a point in his favor, LOL.

        If not for that asshole, we could’ve had a decent language embedded in the browser, like Scheme or Python!

        • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean… if there wasn’t someone inventing a usable open source language for the browser it could have been some weird proprietary Microsoft language and our sites would still look like web 1.0

  • Glitterkoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Tried it for a week or two, but since I reinstalled Firefox I really don’t understand why I was judging/hating so much in the past years. Yes, Chrome/ium used to be waaaay faster, but Mozilla just has their shit together most of the time. The Debian of browsers so to speak.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Firefox is GOAT, but I do have Brave installed on my phone specifically for playing YouTube. The Brave browser automatically blocks YouTube ads, allows me to play videos in windowed mode, and allows me to play videos with the screen off.

      I don’t do anything else in Brave, so I’ll probably hang onto it as basically a YouTube app.

    • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I use Brave occasionally, but Firefox has been my #1 for the past 100 years or so. I stopped using Firefox as my only browser after they overhauled the interface. I really miss classic Firefox with my tabs on bottom, old search engine bar, and endless customizations.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I had been pretty happy to find brave search as an alternative search engine, but this is kinda making me rethink using their products… :(

      It’d be cool if someone could build an open source extension for Firefox that takes their idea of using browsers as a distributed crawler, but while making it clear that a website is being crawled and not selling the data for AI training, but honestly thats just me daydreaming. I’d love an open and private search engine that isn’t just a meta search :(

      Edit:

      Mojeek is UK based, open and private and actually have their own index, they aren’t just a meta search, but they dont have much in the way of any kind of summary or highlighted answers if you’re looking more for an answer to a question than the list of websites

      Yep doesn’t come up as much when people mention privacy, but makes decent privacy claims, and aims to build a more fairly monetized search engine by giving 90% of money from ads to content creators (no idea how that will eventually work, but its a compelling concept)

      Quant seems to have decent results from my initial couple searches, but like mojeek doesn’t seem have any kind of summary or answers function.

      I think I’ll give all three a try each time I have a difficult search task and see if any of them might be worth switching to. Right now I often have to switch over to google even from brave when I’m having a hard time finding something.

      • Cabrio@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Firefox is now faster than Chrome as of the latest benchmarks.

      • DrQuint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Oh shit turn on CNN, a plane just flew onto one of the twin towers!

        … What? Wait, we’re not quoting old posts? I dunno man, I know this is a huge “works on my machine”, but I really haven’t seen Firefox be a problem on any machine in at least, hard minimum, half a decade.

  • DebraBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    One of the founders, Brendan Eich, donated his money to take away the equal right for same-sex couples to marry in California (Prop 8). He never acknowledge that it was mistake, so I can only assume that he truly wants to see the marriages of same-sex couples erased, which is quite a hateful thing to desire.

    • NeroToro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not supporting is one thing but being so actively against, is interesting

      • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        There’s something that doesn’t click in the article, they say:

        the issue at stake about that proposition was declaring a marriage to be an union of one man and one woman

        But just before that they link to the Wikipedia article:

        support for the Proposition 8

        Which states:

        Proposition 8 […] was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage

        So I fail to understand how this:

        Even couple of LBGT employees of Mozilla Corp. defended Brendan Eich on their blogs claiming that there is no discrimination against them in Mozilla

        Could be possible, I tried searching for their blog post, since the author didn’t link it anywhere, but not knowing who they are I wasn’t able to find anything. It could be true, but still, Mozilla isn’t the whole California, if they are treated well due to company culture good for them, but that isn’t an excuse to let gay people be discriminated outside of Mozilla

        It seems to me like what everyone thinks is right, even if the proposition were made to “declare marriage a union of man and woman” it would just be a roundabout way to say “declare union between man and man/woman and woman not marriage” so… ban same-sex marriage?

      • oolong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes and my opinion is that being anti-gay marriage is a shitty opinion that should be criticised.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone knows the only safe way to browse is to scrape webpages and print the content to your terminal.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I use curl to pull the text in a bsd jail running on a qemu instance running on a qubes vm and then copy it down on engineering paper and reconstruct it in my brain

    • what@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Such a noob didn’t even pipe it through grep to block advertising. Get outta here corporate shill.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      They got their start redirecting ads to sponsored ads. I’ve never understood the love for that browser.

    • crystal@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The browser is highly performant, contains (nearly) all necessary (usability and privacy) features and is suitable for beginners.

      The search has a nice interface that is usable without javascript, has an onion site and should be low on telemetry. It also (in my opinion) has the best search results after Google. And these search results are Brave’s own results, not just resold Bing results; so they’re actually bringing real competition to the search engine market.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I know people advertise a lot of good things for Brave. But I’ve never seen them. It’s installed in my system, it’s what I spin up to enter shady websites (don’t ask), because it works well with ad based hidden link providers. But it’s not that performant, vanilla Brave is way slower than riced up Firefox on my system. It shows sponsored ads, it straight tells you that it might collect data, it’s bloated with buttons and crypto bullshit. I just don’t see what any of the shills are talking about, and it sells your activity on the browser to AI trainers because their search engine is just that, a meta search engine crawler, sorry but it’s just like any other browser.

  • amenotef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    To me Firefox is the best browser.

    I use Chrome because I’m lazy to move, I have my stuff synced in there and I use it also with my phone (Google Pixel). But lately I’m considering Firefox more and more. At least I now have it installed in my phone and specifically use it for some stuff.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I made the move, there are mild inconveniences, but you can export your passwords, bookmarks, et al. from chrome to firefox, you can even set firefox as your primary source for app password suggestions on android. The biggest win is having UBlock Origin on my phone browser.

  • cpo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It started with widgets showing crypto currency markets.

    I immediately noped the hell off it.

      • cpo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If brave pretends to safeguard my privacy they would not push some shady crypto stuff in my face without opting in, right?

        • F7o@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          You know they started as a crypto browser? With BAT as their native token? Which is a cool system, as users get paid to watch ads. And yes, that’s opt-in

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s pretty dumb. Brave is looking for any and every monetisation opportunity. Can’t blame them, with competition having free browsers, but it doesn’t exactly make them trustworthy.

    Someone please make a fork of Brave without the nonsense?

  • dtc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Been using brave for a few years on mobile and desktop.

    They uses to give away BAT, but they have refined their system to not give any unless you spend hours jumping through hoops and linking shoddy Chinese financial apps and crypto wallets.

    I still use it for the privacy, but after reading this I will likely switch back to firefox or another chrome based browser.

    • Jeom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      decided to give the bat thing a go, had to sign up for this crypto thing. that is the only time I’ve ever been apart of a security breach

      • dtc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve had nothing but issues, first things were good, then you had to make an Uphold account. Couldn’t do that from my country, then account limit issues. You can only link your wallet to 4 devices and if you reset your phone it counted as adding a device. Locked me out of my wallet after 1 phone upgrade and replacing the cpu on my desktop.

        Currently you have to set some sort of account overseer to collect BAT. I still get the ads, but they haven’t sent a payout in months.

        All in all I estimate about 450-550 BAT I “earned” watching their ads over the last 3 or 4 years was never paid out.

  • Brochetudo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t and won’t ever understand why people keep recommending Brave. This is not even the second or third shady shit they pull off.