Everything on the Internet is public domain.

If I disappear for 3 weeks, assume I’m dead.

  • 2 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle

  • It seems like most FOSS I’ve seen is a free, buggy, alternative to mainstream software, which resolves a problem the user had.

    I don’t know what kind of sw you use, but usually I find Foss software to be sleek, functional, fast with good support and updates, while commercial software is ridden with ads, trackers, bloat and bugs. Exceptions on both sides but the notion that free software is generally worse is categorically incorrect.

    Everyone can contribute, but how do they make a living?

    So first not everyone can contribute. Usually people who also use the software and have personal (or monetary) interest in it, contribute.

    And why does everything has to be about monetisation? Yes, both people and gigantic corporations make money off foss in various ways, I’m sure others have explained that already. But people also do things for other reasons than just money.

    But I’m just baffled how people so often declare that foss can’t work or that it’s qualitatively worse, even though the entire planet has been dependent on foss for decades.

    No, just because someone sells something directly, doesn’t mean it’s inherently better.











    • you open your code under a licence that means other people can use it, that means other people can use it

    • reporting a bug is not demanding free labor

    Like how do you think this is supposed to work?

    A) That everyone who wants to use open source stuff needs to be a programmer and contribute?

    B) That if someone posts code under GPL or some other licence permitting commercial use, that it’s not permitting commercial use anyway?

    C) That you need to pay to report a bug?

    Come on. If the dev wants to only fix particular things and wants payment for fixing other things, fine, but don’t say this is the only way foss should work.



  • Hot take, but the main issue is - developing a program requires programming skill. Shocker, I know. But think about it, a ton of people may be interested in “taking on” a project, but without being a programmer, nothing can come out of it, unless somebody takes care about the program so much they’re willing to fund development.

    Is there a solution? Maybe soon we’ll have AI programming assistants good enough that even a non-programmer can do something useful with source code. At least temporarily keep the project alive with minor updates until someone more experienced comes along.

    You know what grinds my gears more however? Rewrites. Whenever a small foss projects announces a complete rewrite, I consider it done, as it’s virtually certain it will be abandoned and the rewrite will never be finished. Seen that soo many times, it’s insane why people attempt it in the first place. Actually insane if the same thing keeps happening over and over and yet you expect different results…

    Recently I’ve seen that NewPipe is getting a rewrite. While I have more trust in these guys than in some other projects, it’s time to look into alternatives.