• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    The YouTube ad-blocker ban isn’t stupid at all.

    Something isn’t a bad business decision just because you don’t like it. That’s now how business works.

    “I won’t watch videos at all if I can’t view them without watching ads or paying money.”

    …Yeah. That’s the idea. From a business perspective people who don’t pay or view ads are leeches they’re perfectly happy to burn off.

    • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you view people as purely advertising receptacles then this business move is logical. But if you view people as agents that can build their own alternatives or advertise your services then this would seem to be a dumb business move.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you view people who actively cost you money while bringing nothing to your business as assets you’re bad at business.

        If 100% of people who used adblockers decided to stop using YouTube entirely over this, the only result would be YouTube saving money. Video hosting is simply too expensive for anyone to make a website where anyone can host and view for free without ads.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          bring nothing to your business

          Well that’s the contention. Your example starts and ends with people leaving YouTube. If YouTube is the limit of consideration then yes, no value exists outside YouTube and this is a silly argument.