• @Companion1666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    if only ads arent annoying and loud, i have no problems unblocking them. but damn, they’re unbearable atleast in my region.

    • @lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Simply not having them repeat so often would already go a long long way. I always end up with the same ad 20 times in a row and it’s not even relevant to me. I don’t get how the ad industry can be worth billions of dollars and be so complete crap at what they do. Most of the stuff I watch on Youtube is essentially already an ad to begin with, all the unboxing, reviews, sponsored content, etc. is just showing me what new products are out there, and they do it in an entertaining fashion. Why are the actual ads so much worse?

      • @Tom_bishop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -42 years ago

        Ads are served based on your browsing history. If you have never watched those, then you probably should check on you 8yo child or wife’s who’s using the same acc

        • @Companion1666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ads are served based on your browsing history.

          Not really. Ads served on Google ecosystem is geo-based, if you don’t logged in your Google account or where your YouTube connected. You cannot get rid of it, unless you wipe all Chrome and Android users.

        • Katrina
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I’m pretty sure there’s nothing in my browsing history that would suggest I’m looking for a boyfriend 🤮

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Do you have briefing history turned on? If so, hmmmm…

  • @SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    A good ad blocker would be one that will still load the page as intended but not display the ads. There would be no way for the site to know you can’t see them. Blocking their activation just signals the site that you are using an adblocker.

    Edit: I was thinking more of a VM sandbox like another comment said

    • @piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Sandbox the ads. Trick them into thinking the playback is finished. If there is a timer that prevents skipping, modify timing calls to shorten the duration. Or execute faster than real-time.

      If there is some kind of timer callback to server, it would even be preferable to have ad “running” invisibly with a progress bar and no ad.

    • @BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      A good ad blocker would be one that will still load the page as intended

      One could make a strong argument that the creators of the page intended the page to show ads.

      If you want to block them, that’s fine with me, but arguing that not displaying ads is the intended experience of the page is just incorrect.

      • gian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I think he means that a good adblocker should load the page as intended with the ads and then simply discard them before rendering the page.

    • @foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I love how a massive Internet company is trying to act like their service isnt on the internet and like they don’t know what that means

      🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

      Currently downloading all of my favorite YouTubers content ad free 🖕

  • celerate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2182 years ago

    Dear YouTube, if anyone there ever reads this.

    I tried not to block ads, I would let the preroll go and usually not skip it.

    I started skipping ads when they started getting long. I recall some were several minutes long at times.

    I started leaving videos part way through when there were mid-roll ads, and those got long enough that I’d often forget what I was even watching.

    I started blocking the ads outright when I would be watching a relaxing video, and a very loud mid-roll ad would blow out my goddamn eardrums.

    Fuck you YouTube. You abused your users, you chased off good content creators, and now you’re offering people no carrot and all stick. How about you offer to match the volume of the ads to the videos, limit the length of ads to something reasonable, and nicely tell viewers that you are making ads less annoying and that unblocking the ads helps pay the content creators.

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      English
      962 years ago

      I used to make animations for YouTube, which weren’t monetized because I hate ads, and one day they copyright struck me for some very provably public domain music, but the way they did it was to insert ads into my video without my consent so they could monetize them to send the money to the scammer who flagged me. So I just deleted my entire account, fuck them.

  • @Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    Even if I have to sit through 30 seconds of silence, is there a way to redirect the ad to a ghost browser so I don’t have to listen to something like grubhubs stupid video?

      • @418teapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Definitely agree, but your link is protected by cloudflare (yet another centralized service destroying the internet) and therefore I’m unable to get through because I have privacy.resistFingerprinting enabled on my browser so cloudflare is unable to determine I’m human I suppose.

        I despire youtube and it’s monopoly, and I think it get’s an appropriate amount of hate on here and HN, but what confuses me to no end are the people who complain about youtube turn right around and constantly recommend cloudflare. Can someone explain what I am missing?

      • @Acters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I hear the ungoogled chromium is immune to the youtube antiadblock bs while getting rid of google’s influence, leaving you to be able to keep your Firefox identity safe without compromising your privacy by going to a browser you know is maintained by a community instead of another corporation

    • @poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -192 years ago

      Hello, you must be new here. We don’t like to be held accountable for anything and simply vocalize all our problems in an echo chamber where we collectively agree that other people should be held accountable instead. I hope this offers some context for the downvotes.

  • ilikenoodlez
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -122 years ago

    Youtube is squeezing one party really hard while pretending the other party doesn’t owe shit to keep their monopoly. Start charging uploaders. If YouTube needs to up what they’re earning because of things like bandwidth cost and what not make uploaders cover some of that cost. They’re a business making money off of the platform so charge them.

    • @ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      This is the worst possible take I’ve heard this week, probably this year.

      You would fuck over thousands of people, in addition to creating a bar of entry for anyone wanting to post a video or start a channel. Like I genuinely don’t even know where to begin explaining how bad this take is.

      • ilikenoodlez
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -62 years ago

        My statement was far too broad for it to be “setting a bar of entry”. YouTube is trying to squeeze its viewers for every drop they can without having uploaders and im obviously not talking about the little guy here shoulder any of that cost. Who in your mind is responsible for the cost associated with lets say a Mr Beast video? Is it Mr Beast or is it the viewer? I think it’s both.

      • @poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        But I don’t want to pay and I want everything for free! Make somebody else pay for my enjoyment!

  • @anewbeginning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I haven’t watched live tv in almost 20 years because I refuse to sit through ads, and I definitely won’t sit through them on YouTube. If it was a banner or some thing on the page or the side of video that would be more acceptable, but sitting through ads to watch a YouTube video….there’s just no way.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    742 years ago

    If you’re using uBlock Origin. Go to “Filter Lists” and Purge All Caches. That may help.

  • @laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -62 years ago

    Look this is different than pirating a game or bypassing a newspaper paywall. Watching content on YouTube simply costs money to YouTube. It’s not like torrenting a game or movie, where while you haven’t paid for the content, it didn’t cost anything to the owner other than theoretical revenue. And it’s not like bypassing a newspaper paywall, either, where the cost to the newspaper to serve you the story is practically negligible and the real costs are fixed and not related to how many people actually read the story.

    Hosting video costs money and nobody can replace YouTube’s massive library or realistically replicate their business model. I mean just look at image/gif hosting sites, they constantly go bust like Photobucket because storing everyone’s pictures forever and for free isn’t not a real business model.

    YouTube needs to be paid for its gonna go the way of Photobucket.

    • @Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Corpo shill alert

      YouTube doesn’t need to get paid (by the users watching their ads) they get paid through you, the actual product. What you watch what you click on what you search for, these are ALL monitizable. You think Google is protecting your data instead of selling it lmao

      Furthermore how much is enough? They gonna keep adding more and more unskipable ads more pre/mid/post rolls, b-b-but the multi fucking billion dollar corpo needs to get pAiD!!!

      Grow up

    • @uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Google has billions. YouTube pirates (can we call ourselves that yet?) are not going to bankrupt Google. In fact, Alphabet is spending more on their crackdown for sake of principle.

      But Google is beholden to its shareholders, whose interests are diametrically opposed to that of the general public, so any gain by Google is a loss to the rest of us.

      So any profit we can deny the Google machine remains instead in the economy, rather than vaulted in offshore accounts or used to further lock down the empires of the shareholders.

      The day I can’t watch YouTube sans commercials is the day I quit watching YouTube. And then it will get absolute-zero engagement from me.

      So bring it. I do not need YouTube, and it needs viewers like me.

    • @Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Good luck trying to talk about this with any amount of reason.

      I’m a pirate, I understand what I’m doing is defrauding the tos of a mega corporation. I UNDERSTAND that and IM DOING IT ON PURPOSE.

      But it seems like most of the people here are just going to hurl insults at you and call you a shill because you laid it out as “this cost money and the business needs money to even do it”. This is how “free” services have always worked. They aren’t a fucking charity.

      I don’t like ads so I do everything in my power to not see ads. Once they kill ReVanced and they start banned Google accounts, I’ll just stop using YouTube unless I have a specific tutorial need.

    • El Barto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I normally complain about the same thing being reported over and over. But this one event is actually affecting a lot of people who use the fediverse.

      • @smolyeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -32 years ago

        It’s not really a problem though, least not one worth being constantly all over my feed. the solution is in the picture. Allow YT ads or pay , it’s really not the hard.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          The thing is that it’s been proven that companies will still make a profit by selling your data, or showing you ads later when your plan suddenly becomes “Cheapo option” and they force you to upgrade to “plus options, no ads”.

          Why enable that?

          • @smolyeet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            When that happens to YouTube , I’ll change my mind. But until then I’m not going to continue acting entitled to keep using an adblocker because I feel they don’t need the profit. I solved that problem by paying for premium years ago. If you’re concerned about having your data sold, why even use the service. I’m helping support the content I’m watching either with ads or by paying premium. What they do with that information is a separate issue.

        • @DerEineDa@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          “but but but, I wanna consume stuff for free!! And my mommy won’t buy me YouTube premium!”

          – people in this thread

  • BattleGrown
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    Advertisement is brainwashing and should be against human rights.