• Razzmadazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    2 years ago

    In other news lemmy engagement is up 200% on the week

    Don’t fact check me I pulled this out my ass

  • krigo666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Last week, the text-based social media platform reported a record 100 million sign-ups in just five days.”

    LOL The biggest bullshit of the year… Meta just created shadow accounts of all Instagram users, without their knowledge or consent…

    • Shadesto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      100 million isn’t that much when it comes to Meta. There’s over 2 billion “active” Instagram users that all were prompted to download the app. That means only 0.005% of Instagram accounts fell for it.

      I have no doubt that at least that many people tried it out. When I went to the Android App store, Meta was paying for a front and center promotion of Threads.

    • Master@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is there a way to check if a user account exists for my instagram account without logging in?

      • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        People who voluntarily tried out Threads is not the claim that was made:

        Meta just created shadow accounts of all Instagram users

        That is a lie.

    • chem_bpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not to mention all the spam bots they fail to actually ban after multiple people report.

  • PineapplePartisan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    They gave up all their personal data to see a crappy algo-driven social media site. Meta still considers this a win.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s Google Plus all over again.

    If people wanted the bird app, they would have already got the bird app, if they don’t like the bird app, they would have got a Mastodon account.

    It feels like the same reason that Reels isn’t doing well, people who wanted TikTok would have already got TikTok, you can’t force Instagram users to like Twitter/TikTok but on their Insta account instead.

    • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      if they don’t like the bird app, they would have got a Mastodon account.

      Doubt. The venn diagram of people who don’t want to use twitter and people who know what mastodon is, are separate circles with little overlap. Mastodon is not mainstream, like reddit. Redditors are still in denial about this.

      Go ask a random 40 year old if they know what reddit is.

      Even less people know about mastodon.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I should have been more specific, what I meant was "people who want to use a microblogging platform but don’t like who’s running the bird app. "

        But I would say reddit is mainstream enough that random 40 year olds probably has heard of it now, after all the large big profile celebrity AMAs, it’s the 10th most visited site in the world and 6th in the US.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Google+ had more than one thing wrong with it. Just for example …

      The precursor to Google+ was called Google Buzz, and it was rolled out to Gmail users in a way that exposed privacy & security problems with Gmail contacts. This led to a lawsuit and a settlement which Google had to obey when releasing their next “social media” attempt.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Buzz#Privacy

      As a result, Google+ became a heavy-handed effort that tried to hew closely to the settlement’s privacy & consent requirements while assimilating seemingly-unrelated projects such as YouTube comments.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        IMHO Google+ had one good thing: Circles. You could define groups of people to share stuff with, without those people having to “join a group”.

        I don’t think people understood it well, though.

    • sriracha_no_big_deal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It feels like the same reason that Reels isn’t doing well, people who wanted TikTok would have already got TikTok, you can’t force Instagram users to like Twitter/TikTok but on their Insta account instead.

      I’m never going to download or sign up for TikTok. I know Meta isn’t really that great as far as privacy goes, but at least they don’t share information directly with the CCP. Fuck the CCP. IG Reels works just fine for me. I actually can’t stand the IG home feed because of the algorithm showing me what it wants to show me instead of a chronological timeline of the posts of the people I follow, so I mostly just use IG for stories and Reels.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah I hate that curated list bullshit. It made both FB and YouTube worse, too. And both were intended to manipulate users into spending more time there. Ironically, I haven’t been on as many YouTube dives into the random following interesting videos from the recommended ones since they started curating their list based on what you’ve previously watched (and seemingly picking one or two of them to tunnel vision on).

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          YouTube used to work by showing you videos that other people who watched that video watched, which was really great for music discovery. Now it shows me things that I already watched with a small sprinkling of new things. The front page still suggests things I haven’t seen before related to things I watched. I think they were pressured to make that change because it was taking impressionable people too quickly down rabbit holes of extremism… seems like it still does though.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Unless you live in China, are a Chinese national, or have someone living in China who could be used to blackmail you, then you shouldn’t care much about what data the CCP has on you.

        Meta shares data with the NSA and likely any other US allies, so that might be a slight concern if you live in any country like that.

        Lemmy makes all its data essentially free for everyone to grab, so… Hi CCP, Hi NSA, Hi CIA, Hi MI6, Hi FSB…

  • qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    But, he added, Sensor Tower data suggests a significant pullback in user engagement since Threads’ launch: On Tuesday and Wednesday, the platform’s number of daily active users were down about 20% from Saturday, and the time spent for user was down 50%, from 20 minutes to 10 minutes.

    strange. my “engagement” on lemmy is… “all day”. strange indeed.

    • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe because we “care for each others” opinions. The weird thing about converting instagram users automatically to thread users is, that instagram is mostly a one-to-many communication. One Insta Model posting her newest picture and then thousand others comment and like it. Thread (and Lemmy) are more back and forth and commenting on comments. That means we have an active dialogue where things are discussed in a more natural way. The Insta model does not give a shit about a bi-directional communication with their followers. They prefer a mostly one way communication of send and receive (like or die). They don’t really care for their followers opinions and certainly are not interested in a deeper dialogue with them. They want to expand their reach and likes first of all. Threads is very different in the interaction than instagram.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is the problem I’ve always had with instragram. For a while I was storing certain pictures on there only because it seemed like a good place to store them that I could share with people if the time ever came for that (it didn’t). The engagement side of things looked very slim.

      • qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        absolutely. I am in search of peers, not influncers.

        I would suspect that most of us on discussion board style platforms (and lemmy in particular) want peer engagement - something that is building quite nicely on lemmy.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I tried it, because I still have a Facebook account I barely used.

      I got like two screens of people I subscribed to and after they are out of new posts the platform tries to push a bunch of popular influencers and brands that I couldn’t care less about. They couldn’t get me to close it faster if they tried.

  • decadentrebel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m one of the many who deactivated not too long after it launched. My dashboard was just being filled with so many users (mostly celebrities and influencers) who I don’t recall ever following or even being on my sphere of interest. It doesn’t help that their posts are inorganic attempts to spur engagement.

    • Matt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Threads never released in the EU in the first place, so this absolutely is not the reason for lowered engagement.

      In an indirect way it could be though - not having the entirety of the EU on Threads is a huge non-starter for many people, as many of their favourite influencers, celebrities, companies, etc will be from the EU who were never able to get on it.

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s pretty hard to start working in the EU if you look at the absolute pile of data that Threads demanded. The GDPR paperwork to make sure they can get away with that AND still comply to GDPR would be more than the whole internet.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    They launched it without addressing the obvious issues like spam and low-quality content. The easy migration from Instagram basically turned threads into… Instragram. Literally the same low quality posts and low quality engagement of Instagram transfered over. Seriously, have you ever read comments on Instagram? It’s the bottom of the barrel in the every sense of the expression. That’s Threads now.

    Also, poetically threads on Threads are even harder to follow and navigate than Twitter.

    • Nijuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Isnt instagram primarily used for… pictures and images? I seen comments the times i have used it - the comments are generally very low quality and low brow.

      • asparagus9001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think both of your points are correct but a lot of celebrity types write straight up essays attached to some of their pictures - it’s like where they get out everything they can’t fit into 280 characters.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anyone signing up for a new Meta account isn’t going to be suddenly surprised at how invasive it is. The people who signed up for Threads obviously don’t give a shit about privacy, as much as I’d like to think otherwise.

    • Matt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is absolutely not a concern for 99% of people. As much as we (rightfully) scream about it on Lemmy and Mastodon, most people don’t care.

      Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and others are already collecting this information already, it’s so strange to see people acting like this is a new phenomenon.

  • crowsby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Makes sense. People are thirsty for a something along the lines of “Twitter, but fewer nazis”, so tons of people checked it out, but it still lacks feature parity with Twitter since it was a rushed-to-market MVP.

    I think once it adds on a handful of new features, it’s only a matter of time before audiences gravitate to Threads over a platform whose owner is bragging about funnelling money to human traffickers.

  • Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is it because it’s filled to the brim with old memes? That would make me want to leave a new place. Tried kbin social the other day and the first three pages were all full of the old memes being posted here and i spent half an hour or so trying to figure out how to filter them out but couldn’t so I just uninstalled.

      • Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Look i’m not that much of a curmudgeon that i begrudge people enjoying themselves and getting along, I just need to be able to easily filter content i have no interest in, memes/macros being one of those. I’m still accessing lemmy through mobile browser and can skim past all that quite easily on here, but kbin blew every image up automatically and it was 90% of the content and i couldn’t figure out how to turn it off.

        • nuttydepressor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          You should just need to block the community. There’s a 🚫 symbol on the sidebar of a community, just click that and the posts should stop showing up on any of your feeds.

          If you’re on mobile, the formating is kinda fucked so you’ll have to scroll to the bottom of the page to find it.

  • Lord_Logjam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Probably because it’s a complete mess. I joined as I was curious and don’t really care if I have to delete my Instagram account to get rid of my Threads account. You follow people and then barely see their updates.

    • djmarcone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      From what I’ve heard about the feel it’s a giant data (=cash) grab. Sorta like how Google+ was a me-too and never took off.

      The massive inrush is like what happens when the new restaurant opens in town. Everyone goes once or twice to check it out but if it sucks it will still fail even if it is super busy the first week.

      • kanzalibrary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Because Lemmy top topic before are only talking about Reddit, and people love talk about it since api contro. Now since Reddit hype are down, people start to think how to make Lemmy topic different and somewhat great than on Reddit I think… So, it takes time to see the average Lemmy users activity…

    • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If they all came from Instagram, or is used to how Instagram is, I’m not suprised this happens. People use Insta for likes only, not comments/discussions. Sadly.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I played around with it and it’s basically useless without a follower only feed. And the posts tend to just basically disappear forever after a feed refresh.

    But if they follow through on ActivityPub integration I’ll be stoked to follow all the normies that couldn’t get by on mastodon that are using threads. More content = more better.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I won’t be happy if they integrate federation. Ever heard the phrase “embrace, extend, extinguish”? It’s a tactic used by large companies to squash growing competition.

      Google used it, for example, to squash a growing open-source chat messenger protocol called XMPP. (Think of XMPP like ActivityPub.) Google allowed its Google Talk application to integrate with people using XMPP. (They embraced XMPP.)

      Then, they added their own proprietary features that wouldn’t work with normal XMPP users. (They extended, or built on top of, XMPP.)

      Then, they cut support for XMPP integration, leaving it effectively dead in the water. XMPP users suddenly had a list of Google Talk users in their friend list who would never appear online again, whereas Google Talk users maybe had one or two people in their friend list who looked like they’d moved on from Google Talk. (They extinguished XMPP.)

      Now imagine that happening with Threads. You, a Mastodon user, follow a bunch of people who just happen to be on Threads. There are some things Threads users can do that you can’t, but you don’t really mind. It works well enough. Then, one day, Threads stops working with Mastodon. Suddenly, over half of the people you followed are no longer available to you. The only way you can follow them again… is to join Threads.