BBC will block ChatGPT AI from scraping its content::ChatGPT will be blocked by the BBC from scraping content in a move to protect copyrighted material.

  • Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 years ago

    Makes sense, OpenAI will probably have to apply for a TV-license first.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t live in the UK, but I would gladly pay the TV license fee, or even a premium on top of it, if I had unlimited access to iPlayer. My only option right now is BritBox, which is not great and not really worth the money.

  • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 years ago

    Big businesses wont lift a finger to halt global warming, but the second their precious copyrights are attacked they go into full force.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, yeah? Corporations are always going to act in their best interest, that’s why regulation exists.

  • patawan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Curious what the mechanism for this will be. CAPTCHA can sometimes be relatively easy to pass and at worst can be farmed out to humans.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    It should be illegal for entities like BBC to do this. Copyright is meant to be a temporary, limited construct that carves out an opportunity for creators to profit from their works. It is not perpetual legal dominion over specific ideas. Entities that harvest content to train LLMs should pay for access like everyone else, but after that, they can use the information they learn however they see fit. Now, if their product plagiarizes, or doesn’t properly attribute authorship, that is a problem. But it’s a different issue from what the BBC is fighting here.

    I think there are some content creators that believe they are owed royalties if you even think about a piece they wrote or drew. That is, of course, absurd in terms of human minds. It’s also absurd in terms of other kinds of minds.

        • hazelnot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I agree. Nothing should be copyrighted. But everyone should try their hardest to stop “AI” scammers and the surveillance apparatus as a whole

          • regbin_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t really care about online AI services. I only run stuff locally (Stable Diffusion, LLaMA). No surveillance there.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is a bit like companies blocking Google from their websites.

    You’re only hurting yourself.

  • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    News doesn’t want people to capture their daily propaganda pieces and be able to analyze it.

    Meanwhile news media will buy up all kinds of scrapped data on users to better target their propaganda.

    Cambridge analytica for me but none for thee