Training on copyrighted data should be allowed as long as it’s something publicly posted.

If you make it reproduce copyrighted media, it is a problem.

As long as the stuff it generates doesn’t resemble any copyrighted works, even if it was trained on copyrighted works, I don’t see why that should be problem.

I wish I could care but Valve doesn’t want to sell it here so whatever.

Wow that’s really pricey. Here in Malaysia a 2 HP mini split with inverter costs roughly RM 2400 including installation (around $500).

Granted the average salary here is much lower but it’s amazing how much the prices differ given that they all basically come from the same factory.

That’s wack. I’ve never seen Firefox that take long to open. Here’s a video of it opening in a VM running Ubuntu 22.04: https://streamable.com/aqkftv

Windows 11 is just Windows 10 23H2. It’s just a number. Nothing stops MS from dropping support for older processor in an update for Windows 10.

Disagree. It’s only unethical if you use it to generate the artist’s existing pieces and claim it as yours.

That’s way too expensive. I guess regional pricing did me good because here it costs an equivalent of $3.75 (RM 17.90). That much for Premium + Music ain’t no way I’m not taking it.

Spotify costs $3.35 (RM 15.90).

I don’t really care about online AI services. I only run stuff locally (Stable Diffusion, LLaMA). No surveillance there.

You got that backwards. Fuck copyright. Nothing should be copyrighted.

Never said that.

If you took a random concept and explained it to a person they could using their existing knowledge set, draw it somewhat competently. That is because people are able to apply knowledge to make something new.

Theoretically it can, but it would involve meticulous and proper labeling of each training data. Currently most of the trained data are automatically labeled and they’re not descriptive/verbose enough. I believe the improvements from the latest version of DALL-E is due to OpenAI’s use of a more advanced image labeler.

If you knew the exact terms to get the the AI to recreate something in its training data, it could, 1:1.

That’s because you told it to. Don’t make it recreate existing art then.

And if you ask it to create you something new, no matter what parameters you use it will look like a mess of garbage data.

This is not always true. You can train it on a certain style and a photo of a random object, then have it generate an image of the random object in that style. It will “understand” the concept of a style and an object.

ultimately all the capitalists running these tools see it as is another method to bring the public under their exclusive and totalitarian control.

Exactly why I’m not supporting the closed source paid services (Midjourney, ChatGPT, Bing Chat, DALL-E etc.) and instead advocate for open source projects like Stable Diffusion and LLaMA.

Saying training generative AI models on artists’ work as stealing artwork.

It’s only stealing if you make it generate the copyrighted art and claim it as yours. Otherwise, it’s not any different than artists being inspired by existing art.

Let’s not bring that X/Twitter shit to Lemmy.

How do I install my Game Pass games?

This is super cool. No longer need to fiddle with third-party LLM APIs.

For those worried that your emails contents might get leaked, I’m pretty sure they’re not using your email content to train, but only use it as context. LLMs are stateless, as soon you you start a new chat, it forgets everything from before.

Only because I get both YT Premium and YT Music for cheap ($4/month).

If it’s fully remote, yes.