• chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    It’s profoundly chauvinistic to think that people who speak other languages don’t have the same depth of literary resource as English-speakers because Wikipedia has fewer users.

    Books. They’re called books. Every nation speaking every language has them.

  • Bloefz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    Does it really matter? I think the extreme amount of languages in the world right now is not helping us communicate. I don’t view language as a cultural heritage thing, just a communication protocol. And I have moved around a lot in the world, it’s very difficult to be constantly adapting to different languages. That causes a societal integration barrier for me.

    I think if we had a universal language (note that it wouldn’t have to be English) we would be able to understand each other better and have less wars.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    As soon as you leave the big languages, esp. English, Wikipedia can be very problematic for all sorts of reasons.
    Mostly because of a lack of eyeballs.
    But it doesn’t end with merely badly written/generated content but also with narrative manipulation that - unlike in the English version - remains unchallenged.