• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Donald Trump threatens retaliatory tariffs if Europe enforces its own rules. He brands the taxation of US tech giants on par with European firms, the user rights enshrined in the Digital Services Act, and the competition sanctions under the Digital Markets Act as discrimination against US companies—essentially demanding that Europe renounce its own democratic rules in the digital realm.

    We all know this, but it bears repeating.

    I hope both EU politicians and the EU countries’ politicians will recognize the full extent to which the USA is not our ally or even willing partner anymore. (Slow) efforts towards digital sovereignty have been there for a while, but the urgency has increased by orders of magnitude, yet many still follow the old playbook where the USA is our “friend”.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s the same manipulative bullshit that was sold by the Brexiteers. Keeping rules aligned is in everyone’s interest to make trade easy. The US wants to make it easy for its tech companies. Europe wants to make it easy for eg its car manufacturers. If you’re aware of Dieselgate, then you know that Europe can’t claim the moral high ground.

      Of course, the internet is trickier in that regard in that we all share it, in a sense. You can see the problem in the current exchange between 4chan and the UK. The UK demands that the Americans at 4chan follow its own democratic rules, which is not what I’d call democratic. The UK will have to create a national firewall to police communications.

      • gian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Of course, the internet is trickier in that regard in that we all share it, in a sense. You can see the problem in the current exchange between 4chan and the UK. The UK demands that the Americans at 4chan follow its own democratic rules, which is not what I’d call democratic. The UK will have to create a national firewall to police communications.

        It is not tricky. You want to have business in one country, you follow the law of the country. You don’t agree ? You exit the country.
        It is as simple as that. And that is true also for the US tech giants

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I know 4chan is not in UK. Neverthless you need to follow the laws of the country you offer service to.
            Being in US is not a free pass to not abide the UK’s laws, if you want to have a presence in UK. As I said, you don’t like them, do not offer the service.

            • General_Effort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              To be clear: You are in good company with that attitude. Lawmakers seem to view things the same way as you. I’m just trying to learn more about how that view comes about.

              • gian
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Is not a problem with the lawmakers, it is to respect the law of the country in which you offer a “service”. And it is valid also for web sites. Now, I suppose you would agree that Amazon US cannot sell me (in Italy) an item that was not legal here, like gun, am I correct ? Like we in EU cannot sell an item to US customers since it is not legal in US. Then depending on the item, there can be a US version and a EU version (think cars probably).

                So, why a US site should not respect also the laws of the country the pages are visible ?

                I completely agree that the UK’s law is beyound stupid, but still, if you want to operate somehow in UK you need to follow it.
                You can fight it, no doubt, and even violate it, if you are willing to accept the consequences, but here 4chan has simply a binary choice: follow it or block access from UK.

                • General_Effort@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Now, I suppose you would agree that Amazon US cannot sell me (in Italy) an item that was not legal here, like gun, am I correct ?

                  If you, being in Italy, caused an American to send a gun from the US to Italy, I believe Italy would prosecute you for gun smuggling. It would confiscate and possibly destroy the contraband. But I don’t think they would try to prosecute the American. I’ve never heard of such a thing.

                  Do you think maybe feelings on such matters are changing?

              • gian
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                The pages are visible from a person navigating from UK.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Stole “Hadrian’s Firewall” off another lemmy comment. Perfect, ain’t it?

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Which shows that the EU isn’t worried by what is happening in the US. That could worry us.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Places in Germany and Denmark are moving not only away from US servers but US software.

      The reason is “digital sovereignty”

      So they’re investing in open source solutions. If it works there will be a reason and options to move for political reasons.

      If it works and saves money expect a bigger shift.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sure I get what you’re saying.

      That the EU is not worried about the status quo? That’s false.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What makes you think so? They invest something like €3 billion in AI. For hyperscalers I am not aware of anything. IT is investor driven and within the EU there is not enough capital to compete. So the EU must have accepted to be dependend on US services.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    These people are completely divorced from reality. I think they don’t even know what the laws they negotiate mean.