• the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 month ago

    And suddenly these same assholes will tell you to turn your ac off because the power grid can’t meet demand for some “mysterious” reason.

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    “To the best of our knowledge, it is the largest data center — we think of it as a campus — in the world,” OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane told The Associated Press last week. “It generates, roughly and depending how you count, about a gigawatt of energy.”

    Why is this guy saying a datacenter generates energy? It does literally the exact opposite. I guess you don’t need to actually know anything to get a leadership role at openai, as long as you can say lots of words.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some of these facilities do generate a significant portion of their own electricity via various means. It’s not like that amount of energy is just sitting out there on the grid waiting to be used. Somebody has to generate it and if you’re already investing millions in rectifiers, batteries, and other data center power systems, why wouldn’t you consider taking it a step further?

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I read something about natural gas powered power plants; not sure if it’s this one specifically.

      Because unfortunately this is not the only gigantic climate destroyer AI thingy planned/built.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      But this proposed data center is so big, it would have its own dedicated energy from gas generation and renewable sources, according to Collins and company officials.

      The “depending on how you count” probably refers to the renewables.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My data center has 35MW of generators onsite. No modern DC is designed nor built without backup generators to allow continuous operation during any utility power outages.

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that language is pure corporate BS - data centers CONSUME energy at massive scales (up to 1 gigawatt in this case, which is insane), they’re literally just giant heaters that occasionally produce AI outputs as a byproduct of all that wasted electricty.

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          More like a GW of heat… Thankfully I’m sure that will counteract whatever has caused it to be over 80 degrees on my way to work before 0700.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Every square kilometer of land (0.38 Sq miles in freedom units) gets about a GW of heat from the sun (depending on latitude). I doubt one datacenter will contribute that much…

            • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t know, I’ve been in some hot places but massive cooling towers tend to radiate a bit more (now I know what I’m reading about today) and a data center without the ability to pump heat outside isn’t going to make it a whole day before it’s toast.

              Not necessarily disagreeing, just curious about how much heat is dispersed by the ones here.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        1 gigawatt is not that insane, and I doubt it’s what the datacenter consumes. A rack can easily get into double, even triple digits kW for GPU heavy setups. So let’s say 10 racks per Megawatt. I’m sure such a datacenter has more than 10.000 racks. Plus A/C, and all other “ancillary” uses. A normal datacenter can get close to 1 GW, this thing might be double digits, but I doubt they will publish exact numbers.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember how we were told to switch to led lights and efficient appliances to conserve power? Guess it was just to save it for data centers.

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, and my bill become 1/5 of what it was, so maybe is was a not so stupid thing to do.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    But this proposed data center is so big, it would have its own dedicated energy from gas generation and renewable sources

    Very unfortunate, as this could have been an opportunity to advance the green power agenda. Solar, wind, and nuclear are all more efficient than fossil fuels – so why build new fossil fuel plants?

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because solar and wind plants, while they can be cheap and relatively fast to build, are not as reliable as a datacenter need and it is not predictable, so at most they can supplement some other generation method, in this scenario. Then ok, you probably need less fossil fuel (but gas is not necessary fossil these days).
      And a nuclear plant is probably way longer to build than the datacenter itself, if you ever get the green light to build it.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of that town that Musk basically bought a while back, promising a spaceport or something, and all they really got out of it is a lot of noise and pollution.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can imagine, but hey, someone’s gotta pay for all those Sora videos I’m generating and trashing because the subject had too many extremities.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The state exports almost three-fifths of the electricity it produces, according to the EIA.

    this means to use internal “surplus” electricity in the state, 750mw data center would be supported. The initial build is 1.8gw. Need to increase electricity production in the state by over 150%. Surrounding states that depend on Wyoming imports get screwed if WY production not increased more.

  • Bubbey@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Will AI finally be the push we needed to seriously invest in Nuclear 100%? I’d rather that than solar panel companies create a bunch of garbage to say that they’re “saving le planet”