• Panties@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    No earphone jack again. That’s a bit sad. Even though I mainly use BLT earbuds, I still sometimes wish I could use my wired headphones. It’s just a small inconvenience

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Modularity” but still no headphone jack, couldn’t I just have a backplate with a big bump on it to accommodate a 3.5mm jack?

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Big? The headphone jack is not large enough to protrude from a cell phone chassis. Any company telling you they can’t fit it is just lying to sell you BT headphones.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m assuming they are removing the headphone jack cause the internal components take up too much space. I can’t imagine these companies removing the jacks cause they cost too much money.

              • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re vastly overestimating the space required for a 3.5mm jack, and the reasons for its removal.

                The jack takes up some internal space, but not much at all. The components required internally like the DAC chip are insignificant. It is a potential source of water ingress, but that can be mitigated and has been done many times before.

                The reason for removal is two fold, first you simply don’t have to deal with any of the above, so from an engineering perspective it’s always easier to not do something. The second, and most important, **is to sell wireless headphones. **

                You’ll notice that Fairphone came out with their own earbuds at the same time they removed the headphone jack. You could of course use Bluetooth headphones with the Fairphone 1, 2, and 3, but you weren’t forced to think about it and could just use your existing headphones. Removing the jack ads inconvenience and breaks user habit, causing people to re-evaluate their headphones and consider a new purchase, which the manufacturer just happens to have and likely in a bundle deal.

                Apple, Google, and Samsung have seen huge uplift in earbud sales with the removal of the jack. So the anger of some power users is of no consequence to them. Seeing Fairphone follow in this behaviour what’s disappointing.

    • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I never use wired headphones even though I have a jack in my phone. But I have never bought a phone without a jack and probably never will.

      Ipersonally think it’s user hostile to remove the jack and also goes directly agains the green profile Fairphone wants to have.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was just hoping a phone like fairphone would give me the option to buy a small module or something to let me do it.

      Yes, yes there’s adapters … yes, yes, you don’t need to use it … I understand. I just want it.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not having a headphone jack is just a slap in the face from a company whose whole image is supposed to be longevity and eco-friendly.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No one has been using aux cable mobile headphones for the past 10 years. Headphone jack is e-waste at this point. bluetooth audio is great and if you really want to be a boomer you can use the usb C headphones.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Headphone jack is e-waste

          you can use the usb C headphones

          What the absolute fuck are you talking about? What am I supposed to do with the dozen wired headphones I already have? Some of them decades old? Throw them in the garbage? Sounds real eco-friendly.

          bluetooth audio is great

          It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

          Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

            My 7 years old bluetooth headphone would disagree.

            It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

            And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that, and manufacturer make their decision on that data.

            But lets ignore that, and let’s take my viewpoint as a customer. I don’t want a port I have no use for. I don’t want a DAC I have no use for. I don’t want the extra weight that comes with them.

            My needs conflict with yours, so what’s the only way to make both of us somewhat happy? That’s by making the 3.5mm jack an addon, which is what any manufacturer that does not focus on music listening would do.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that,

              I would love to see the data that says everyone wants wired devices only. I don’t believe you.

              don’t want a port I have no use for.

              Why would you even care!?

              I don’t want the extra weight that comes with them.

              😆 Buddy if you don’t want extra weight you need to talk to these OEMs about making their phones out of giant slabs of glass. A 1g connector isn’t going to make a difference. You’re being completely ridiculous.

              My needs conflict with yours,

              No they don’t. They can meet both of our needs by including a jack. Simple as.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably not a popular thing to say on here, but I think you’ve lost the battle for the earphone jack. It probably just requires way too much real estate to be practical on a modern day cell phone.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It absolutely does not require too much space. And you can still buy phones with headphone jacks, just not any of the (ironically) higher end models because OEMs know they can push their first party bluetooth headphones to these customers.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced…