The video is 15 minutes long and at the four-second mark flashes a screenshot from Zoolander, in which the protagonist unveils the “Center for Kids Who Can’t Read Good.”
It also features a punchy techno backing track while wasting the reviewer’s time with approximately 14 minutes of inactivity.
Should have been an AI generated voice narrating the issue showing the words on the screen with Minecraft gameplay as background.
Idiocracy is now
Should have had a single tone growing in volume and intensity
The best would be to have recorded audio that slowly goes down in volume, with the tone at full blast at the end
Is there a video version of this article?
Probably so they can have an AI Agent watch the video and do the thing or some bullshit
AI agent would process text much easier…
But they need to look busy! Chug along the video!
The most likely explanation for requesting a video is to weed out low quality AI-generated “vulnerability” submissions that hallucinate code that doesn’t compile or APIs that don’t exist. In that context a 1 minute video showing that the report is viable is not much to ask for.
Maybe in some cases. But I’ve been requested by Google support to provide a video for a very simple and clear issue we were having. We have a contract with them and we personally brought up the issue to a Google employee during a call. There was no concern of AI generated bullshit, but they still wouldn’t respond without a video. So maybe there’s more to this trend than what you’re theorizing.
Have you considered that you may be a hallucinating AI yourself?.. Quick, try drawing a full glass of wine!
You need to include videos of Subway surfers and Family Guy funny moments on the sides of the report, and a compilation of satisfying videos in the background
