• JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Capitalism doesn’t sell performance. It sell ‘potential’ and ‘perceived gains’.

    • einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I sell my dates on my potential wealth and potential penis size. People need to get on the capitalism grindset.

      • seven_phone@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        And women sell dates on their potential to do that thing that was discussed but then try to backtrack by pretending they thought it was a joke and didn’t even bring a banana.

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    It shouldn’t be, but it is. 20 years ago, in the far-off year of 2005, a lot of tech companies more or less followed the same path, where it took decades for them to actually be profitable, if they were at all.

    YouTube ran at a deficit for something close to 15 years. AI companies are likely following this trend, and running mostly on investment money, rather than being self-sufficient.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tech companies were in that boat in the late 90s as well.

      The dot com bust deflated it somewhat, but somehow the industry got right back to it within a couple of years.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Totally normal. Just keep throwing stupid amounts of money at it so it can find a way to undercut some existing business structure by operating at a loss until that business is dead and then enshittify. Profit! /s

  • john89@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gotta keep in mind, profit can always be distorted based on how much employees are getting paid.

    Someone is making money. In fact, a lot of people are.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    So now we are actually to the point where we can ask if a corporation or more widely anything at all has any value if it makes no profit.

    There are people in the world who by luck of birth or circumstance have amassed obscene wealth and they after the fact are trying to convince everyone that profit is the only thing of value. These are the real public enemies.

    • john89@lemmy.caBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is the post-scarcity shift. This is how it happens.

      We need to take, by force, those who have too much and give it to those who have too little.

      They will be kicking and screaming. That means we’re doing something right, because they are not our allies.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s how every single company targeting consumer market in the web started. No profit for many years. Majority because of scale of the market. Facebook started making profit after 2012 so for 8 years they were burning money figuring out where to sell their soul to. Now the scale and risk for OpenAI is way bigger, because they have not sold their users fully or we don’t know if they sold it and for exchange for what. It would be funny if they at some point alter their privacy policy and turn out to sell people’s chats to advertising agencies. They might also go bankrupt or turned out to be a scam that hires thousands of people to answer questions.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Same goes for Tesla, it’s severely over bloated even if it’s bubble has shrunk a bit.

    These sort of bubbles should be stopped by the government but why stop that if the politicians themselves are the ones having pumped millions into these bubbles?

    First you gotta make a law prohibiting politicians from having stocks, then watch how fast this problem gets resolved

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why should they be stopped by the government? That assumes the stock market should be logical and predictable but why should that be true? It’s all speculation, just a step above gambling, and people should be allowed to.

      Tesla is a great example. Its stock has never been at an expected level for their revenue or profit. It’s all speculation about their potential to disrupt the car market (which they have), and predictions like 50% growth per year. Even now, self-driving and artificial intelligence seem a bit far fetched to most of us, but if they happen will be very disruptive.

      But yes , politicians should have required ethics standards, including banning insider training. The rest of us have to: how does it make sense for our leaders to have lower ethical standards than everyone else?

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It should be forced to be logical and predictable because Capitalists have made it so the stock market is the only way to really save for retirement.

        Our society and economy shouldn’t be a fun game for the whales to win at the expense of the rest of us.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s typical for tech companies to organize as nonprofits and then restructure because they are losing cash?

      Not sure if I’m misunderstanding you or what part you think is typical

    • john89@lemmy.caBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      People want to jump on the bandwagon and assume they know everything about new technology.

      It’s really easy to take advantage of these laymen with things like traveling to mars or… building underground highways of tubes so people can use transportation like those bank chutes.

      I hope one day, we as a species can recognize these patterns so that we may take steps to break them.

      We don’t need some “big new tech” to solve the world’s problems. We need to turn around and help out our fellow man who has less than us. We have the tools, just not the desire.

      It’s a cultural problem.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The history of the Internet and computers in general is full of investors willing to take seemingly insane chances on overvalued speculative ventures.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Private equity is so pumped full of cash that they basically have nothing better to do with it.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yeah, but not for shitty companies. I’m down to invest in a mom and pop if it helps get it off the ground. Fuck pump and dumps, and people who inflate bubbles.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fuck no it should never be normal. Its against true business. If there wasn’t so much money in the system then a business would have to actually run like a real business.