• themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11625 days ago

    Two types of people reading this:

    “Oh no! We should do everything we can to mitigate the damage.”

    and

    “Fuck it, might as well keep doing what I’m doing.”

    And it’s the latter that got us here in the first place.

  • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    If the people won’t rise up for the sake of their own children then the only solution is to out spend climate change. Capitalism won’t save itself, it will monetize the downfall. So in a way these tech companies are doing exactly what their suppose to but not really what they should.

  • @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2625 days ago

    Startups are developing a whole suite of technologies to try to help

    Do not think that they are seriously trying to save the planet.

    (If they had wanted that, they should have done it 30-40 years ago)

    They just want to make money, like everybody else.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      624 days ago

      Yeah no, it’s just about the latest money grab before we all die

    • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1525 days ago

      Remember it used to be called global warming, because that’s what’s actually happening. But morons thought a cold winter day disproved global warming, so it was renamed climate change.
      And yes we can reverse global warming, but obviously that won’t recreate polar or mountain ice, or lower sea levels quickly, but we can get the temperature down to stop it first, which will also curb the increase in natural disasters, then the restoring of sea levels and ice will take at least decades and probably centuries.

      • @qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        525 days ago

        Hm I always remember hearing this:

        In a confidential memo to the Republican party, Luntz is credited with advising the Bush administration that the phrase “global warming” should be abandoned in favour of “climate change”, which he called a “less frightening” phrase than the former.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz

        https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/27/americans-climate-change-global-warming-yale-report

      • @Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        025 days ago

        I’m pretty sure it wasn’t renamed because people were morons about child weather, at least not completely. It’s always been “climate change”, because that’s a better representation of what is happening.

        The climate is changing, and one is the main side effects it’s global warming… But there’s extra fun side effects, like ocean acidification, that aren’t because of the warning

      • @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        625 days ago

        My point is that slowing down the heating of the planet is doable (though you’d need the majority of the world contributing, which is highly unlikely to happen), but we can’t reverse the damage that has already been done, which some people seem to think is possible.

        We’re not as powerful as we think we are.

        • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          There are gasses and particles that can be released into the atmosphere that will reflect sunlight and warmth away from earth. In theory that could be done very quickly.

          We’re not as powerful as we think we are.

          We could cause a new ice age easily. Just fire off a few percent of the nukes, and we will revert to an ice age almost immediately.
          Of course a side effect would be massive starvation.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            124 days ago

            There are gasses and particles that can be released into the atmosphere that will reflect sunlight and warmth away from earth. In theory that could be done very quickly.

            As far as I remember, that was tried with ships and it has some collateral effects that cause different damages to the oceans.

            • @jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              224 days ago

              I think I recall the opposite. After having somewhat cleaner fuel, the ships cleaner exhaust caused more warming as the sulfur in the fuel was having a side effect of mitigating warming somewhat. It was raised as a point of maybe we should consider the approach of we are in dire straights.

              • gian
                link
                fedilink
                English
                124 days ago

                I remember to have read that change caused some other problems, and these collateral problems were unexpected.

                But I don’t remember if the problem were about the ocean currents or that the ocean was warmer or a mix of the two plus something else.

              • gian
                link
                fedilink
                English
                124 days ago

                My point was that this already tested on a smaller scale with ships: the fuel changed and that changed the exhaust fumes ability to reflect sunlight which cause some problems the proponents of the solution have not foresee.

    • @undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 days ago

      Are you trying to tell me that the spirit of capitalism won’t return to us, dressed in the splendor of new technology, to absolve us of our past planetary transgressions, and take us to a new, perfect place amongst the stars where we will live in profit and harmony for ever?

      Well, thats the second time I’ve fallen for that story…

  • ivanafterall ☑️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    324 days ago

    Then I guess you guys have no use for this climate change reversal machine I made. I knew it was a shit idea. I’m so stupid. I’m scrapping it now.

    • @III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 days ago

      Might I suggest you use the time machine you created to go back and talk yourself out of making the climate change reversal machine. I can think of nothing worse than for you to feel like you are stupid.

      • ivanafterall ☑️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 days ago

        I’m taking my hatred-curing pills back with me to feed to my past self so that I stop hating climate change so much.

  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    424 days ago

    The only examples this article gives of irreversible damage:

    • homes destroyed by hurricanes: clearly and obviously reversible. Build new houses. Fin.

    • rising sea levels: reversible. Cool the climate, get more glaciers, lower sea levels. Obviously it’s more of a “100 years from now” solution, but it’s definitely a solution.

    • lives lost: yeah, that’s a fair point.