• pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just look at those nested parentheses. A true sign of (pedantic) greatness, when a person needs to clarify something in their earlier clarification.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The amount of effort I do to try and avoid using double parentesis is trully herculean.

      I think that stuff is the product of a completionist/perfectionist mindset - as one is writting, important details/context related to the main train of thought pop-up in one’s mind and as one is writting those, important details/context related to the other details/context pop-up in one’s mind (and the tendency is to keep going down the rabbit hole of details/context on details/context).

      You get this very noticeably with people who during a conversation go out on a tangent and often even end up losing the train of thought of the main conversation (a tendecy I definitelly have) since one doesn’t get a chance to go back and re-read, reorganise and correct during a spoken conversation.

      Personally I don’t think it’s an actual quality (sorry to all upvoters) as it indicates a disorganised mind. It is however the kind of thing one overcomes with experience and I bet Mr Torvalds himself is mostly beyond it by now.

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love it™ (The nested parentheses are one of the greatest tools known to mankind (And to all other creatures))

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Funny how he made it basically for his desktop computer.

    33 years later, and Linux is dominating in every part of the OS world except … the desktop.

    (I’m paraphrasing his quote – he said something like this years ago, can’t find it, though.)

    (Edit: to be more fair with quotes, it might be the case that I “hallucinated” the quote. he might not have said that, or he might have just said part of it and other part would be someone else’s comment. This cio.com article is probably a better source on his position )

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would argue that it does dominate the desktop now as well, just not by usage numbers.

      If I was told I had to use a windows desktop these days at home I think I’d start investing in a very large book collection.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Without a distro to rally behind I’m personally somewhat skeptical. Ubuntu was the best shot we had but since switching everything over to SNAPs it’s on the slow side. With the number of Windows ads and early end of support for Windows 10 there’s a real opportunity for desktop Linux, but until there’s a well supported distro that genuinely doesn’t require using the terminal I can’t see there being mass adoption.

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any distro that ships KDE/Plasma as its default desktop should do the trick. I’m not personally using it right now but I hear OpenSUSE Tumbleweed is kicking a lot of rear end lately.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not about the distro. Most distros out right now are pretty good. What you need is hardware that lots of people want to buy with Linux installed on it as the default choice. Normal people don’t want to install any OS, be it Linux, Windows, MacOS or BSD. Whatever comes by default, it’s good.

          I’m pretty sure that right now the most popular Linux distros are ChromeOS and SteamOS. I wonder why

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no guessing what will catch the world by storm. At a party once, Bram Cohen tried to get me interested in his ideas for a a peer-to-peer protocol, and I thought nothing of it.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My cousin’s buddies asked him to build the website for their new ride hailing app but he didn’t feel like doing some rinky dink thing, apparently Travis and them took it in stride though.

    • orangeboats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      People back then just grossly underestimated how big computing was going to be.

      The human brain is not built to predict exponential growths!

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure the eventual conversion of every atom in the universe to computronium will run Linux.