• rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Customers worry about what they can do with it, while investors and spectators and vendors worry about buzzwords. Customers determine demand.

      Sadly what some of those customers want to do is to somehow improve their own business without thinking, and then they too care about buzzwords, that’s how the hype comes.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what if it actually is magic this time? Just this once!? And we miss the hype train?! (This is a sarcastic impression of real conversations I have had.)

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes the cost is sending all of your data to the harvest, but what price can you put on having a virtual dumbass that is frequently wrong?

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      More like “instead of making something that gets the job done, expect pur unfinished product to complain and not do whatever it’s supposed to”. Or just plain false advertising.

      Either way, not a good look and I’m glad it’s not just us lemmings who care.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    LLM based AI was a fun toy when it first broke. Everyone was curious and wanted to play with it, which made it seem super popular. Now that the novelty has worn off, most people are bored and unimpressed with it. The problem is that the tech bros invested so much money in it and they are unwilling to take the loss. They are trying to force it so that they can say they didn’t waste their money.

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly they’re still impressive and useful it’s just the hype train overload and trying to implement them in areas they either don’t fit or don’t work well enough yet.

      • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        AI does a good job of generating character portraits for my TTRPG games. But, really, beyond that I haven’t found a good use for it.

        • Mikina@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          One place where I found AI usefull is in generating search queries in JIRA. Not having to deal with their query language every time I have to change a search filter, but being able to just use the built in AI to query in natural language has already saved me like two or three minutes in total in the last two months.

        • netvor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          …also TTRPH, TTRPI, TTRPJ, TTRPK, TTRPL, TTRPM, TTRPN, TTRPO, TTRPP, TTRPQ, TTRPR, TTRPS, TTRPT, TTRPU, TTRPV, TTRPW, TTRPX, TTRPY and TTRPZ games.

          But beyond that, no good use, no siree.

          PS: spoiler

          that was WAY harder to type than I expected.

      • netvor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even in areas where they would fit it’s really annoying how some companies are trying to push it down our throats.

        It’s always some obnoxious UI element, screaming at me their 3 example questions, and I always sigh and think, “I have to assume you can only answer these 3 particular questions, and why would I ask those questions, and when I ask UI questions I expect precise answers so would I want to use AI for that.”

        I have no doubt that LLM’s have more uses than I can think of, but come on…

        I’m happy for studies like this. People who are trying to smear their AI all over our faces need to calm, the f…k, down.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many of us who are old enough saw it as an advanced version of ELIZA and used it with the same level of amusement until that amusement faded (pretty quick) because it got old.

      If anything, they are less impressive because tricking people into thinking a computer is actually having a conversation with them has been around for a long time.

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They’ve overhyped the hell out of it and slapped those letters on everything including a lot of half baked ideas. Of course people are tired of it and beginning to associate ai with bad marketing.

    This whole situation really does feel dotcommish. I suspect we will soon see an ai crash, then a decade or so later it will be ubiquitous but far less hyped.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What did they even expect, calling something “AI” when it’s no more “AI” than a Perl script determining whether a picture contains more red color than green or vice versa.

      Anything making some kind of determination via technical means, including MCs and control systems, has been called AI.

      When people start using the abbreviation as if it were “the” AI, naturally first there’ll be a hype of clueless people, and then everybody will understand that this is no different from what was before. Just lots of data and computing power to make a show.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t care. At the moment AI is cheap for them (because some other investor is paying for it). As long as they believe AI reduces their operating costs*, and as long as they’re convinced every other company will follow suit, it doesn’t matter if consumers like it less. Modern history is a long string of companies making things worse and selling them to us anyway because there’s no alternatives. Because every competitor is doing it, too, except the ones that are prohibitively expensive.

      [*] Lol, it doesn’t do that either

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I literally uninstalled and disabled every AI process and app in that latest galaxy AI update, which was the whole update btw. my reasons are:

    1- privacy and data sharing.

    2- the battery, cpu, ram of AI bloatware running in the background 247.

    3- it was chaging and doing things which I didn’t want especially in the galary photo albums and camera AI modes.

    • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did it help with battery life? My S24U has not been getting the greatest battery life lately and I wonder if this is why.

      • answersplease77@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about the AI stuff specifically. Check your battery usage to see which process is doing that. but yes debloating in general makes your phone battery longer, and with the help of few more tricks also faster. There are thousands of no-root-required debloating tutorials online.

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve learned to hate companies that replaced their support staff with AI. I don’t mind if it supplements easy stuff, that should take like 15 seconds, but when I have to jump through a bunch of hoops to get to the one lone bastard stuck running the support desk on their own, I start to wonder why I give them any money at all.

  • qx128@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can attest this is true for me. I was shopping for a new clothes washer, and was strongly considering an LG until I saw it had “AI wash”. I can see relevance for AI in some places, but washing clothes is NOT one of them. It gave me the feeling LG clothes washer division is full of shit.

    Bought a SpeedQueen instead and been super happy with it. No AI bullshit anywhere in their product info.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, +1 for SpeedQueen. That’s the brand that every laundromat uses, because they’re basically the Crown Vic of washers; They’re uglier than sin, but they’ll run for literal decades with very little maintenance. They do exactly one thing, (clean your clothes), and they do that one thing very well. They’re the “somehow my grandma’s appliances still work 70 years later, while mine all break after three years" of washing machines.

      SpeedQueen doesn’t have any of the modern bells or whistles… But that also means there’s nothing to break prematurely and turn the washer into the world’s largest paperweight. Samsung washers, for instance, have infamously shitty LCD panels, which are notorious for dying right after the warranty expires. And when it dies, the entire washer is dead until you replace basically the entire control interface. SpeedQueen doesn’t have this issue, because they don’t even have LCD panels; everything is just physical knobs and buttons. If something ever does break, it’s just a mechanical switch that you can swap out in 15 minutes with a YouTube tutorial.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        FYI, all current Speed Queen models except the Classic Series dryer (DC5, not the washer) are electronically controlled. Even the ones with knobs. They are not mechanical and no longer use the oldschool sequencing drums.

        The TR7/DR7 are at least still sold with a 7 year manufacturer’s warranty, though. This is specifically to assuage consumer fears about the electronic control panel.

    • Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speed Queen for the win. I recently replaced a couple of trusty machines that had finally given up after decades of abuse. Went for speed queen, no regrets.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was shopping for a new clothes washer, and was strongly considering an LG until I saw it had “AI wash”. I can see relevance for AI in some places, but washing clothes is NOT one of them.

      I might be thinking the same. But I actually purchased an LG washer a couple months ago and finally got around to finding and reading the manual, and realized that I should have been doing “AI wash” instead of the “normal wash” that I always did.

      The manual says that this is what “AI wash” actually is for:

      “This cycle automatically adjusts wash and rinse patterns based on load size”.

    • adistantmirror@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speed Queen is great stuff. It will last just about forever. When it does break it is built so it can be repaired.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also just listening and reading what people say. We don’t want fucking AI anything. We understand what it might do. We don’t want it.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In your own words, tell me why you’re calling today.

    My medication is in the wrong dosage.

    You need to refill your medication is that right?

    No, my medication is in the wrong dosage, it’s supposed to be tens and it came as 20s.

    You need to change the pharmacy where you’re picking up your medication?

    I need to speak to a human please.

    I understand that you want to speak to an agent, is that right?

    Yes.

    Chorus, 5x. (Please give me your group number, or dial it in at the keypad. For this letter press that number for that letter press this number. No I’m driving, just connect me with an agent so I can verify over the phone)

    I’m sorry, I can’t verify your identity please collect all your paperwork and try calling again. Click

    Why ever would we be mad?

    • derfunkatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I went through a McDonald’s drive-thru the other day and had the most insane experience. For the context of this anecdote, I don’t do that often, so, what I experienced was just weird.

      While not quite “AI,” the first thing that happened was an automated voice yells at me, “are you ordering using your mobile app today?”

      There’s like three menu-speaker boxes, and due to where the car in front of me stopped, I’m like in between the last two. The other speaker begins to yell, “Are you ordering using your mobile app today?”

      The person running drive-thru mumbles something about pull around. I do. Pass by the other menu “Are you ordering using your mobile app today?”

      Dude walks out with a headset and starts taking orders from each car using a tablet.

      I have no idea what is happening. I can’t even see a menu when the guy gets around to me. Turns the tablet around at me.

      I realized that I was indeed ordering using the mobile app today.

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, this is not new, unless you’re counting all answering machines as AI

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hardly. It used to be natural language dictation and decision tree. Now they’re trying to use LLM training to automatically pick up more edge cases and it’s pretty much b*******.

  • forrcaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve found ChatGPT somewhat useful, but not amazingly so. The thing about ChatGPT is, I understand what the tool is, and our interactions are well defined. When I get a bullshit answer, I have the context to realize it’s not working for me in this case and to go look elsewhere. When AI is built in to products in ways that you don’t clearly understand what parts are AI and how your interactions are fed to it; that’s absolutely and incurably horrible. You just have to reject the whole application; there is no other reasonable choice.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is because AI is usually used to reduce the human cost to the company, and rarely to reduce the human labour for the customer.

    That, or mass surveillance.

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no qualms about AI being used in products. But when you have to tell me that something is “powered by AI” as if that’s your main selling point, then you do not have a good product. Tell me what it does, not how it does it.

  • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I find the tech interesting, but the rush to commercialize it was a bad idea. It’s not ready yet, total uncanny valley.

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally only exciting use for it ive seen so far is that Skyrim companion. And even that doesn’t work right yet.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have rolled back, uninstalled, opted-out, or ripped apart every AI that every company is trying to shove down our throats. I wish I could do the same for search engines, but who uses the internet broadly anymore anyway.

      I am impressed by the tech, I think it’s amazing, but it’s still utterly useless.

      I have never, ever needed to interrupt my day’s schedule to generate a convincing picture of Luke Skywalker fighting Batman while riding dinosaurs, I have never needed to have a text conversation with someone who seems “almost human,” I mean, christ that already describes half the people I know and wish were more normal. I have never needed an article summarized badly, I enjoy reading things, I enjoy writing emails, so I can’t figure out why they would make tools to take away the small pleasures we have. What exactly are they thinking?

      Yesterday I gave it one more chance, asked one of the apps, I forget which, what tomorrow’s weather will be like, the thing forecasted a hurricane coming right for me, a news event from last year. I’m so over AI, please someone notify me when it’s really useful and can take over the menial, tedious tasks like managing my online accounts and offering financial advice or can actually help me find a job opening in my field.

      All these things have been promised, and seem more out of reach than ever.

      The MOST impressive thing I’ve seen AI do is make really, really convincing furry porn babes. The things are good at mixing features in images. Sometimes.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        but it’s still utterly useless.

        this is purely false. There are so many applications that bring value and if you can’t admit that then you are biased in some way/shape/form.

        As a sw dev, I use AI to speed up menial tasks or help me find different perspectives on certain things, shit it’s even helpful for debugging tricky things. You don’t need to be a coder to find value in AI though, things like auto-generated transcripts has been so fucking amazing, especially for podcasting in my case.

        I could go on and on. To say it is UTTERLY USELESS is disingenuous at best.

        The MOST impressive thing I’ve seen AI do is make really, really convincing furry porn babes. The things are good at mixing features in images. Sometimes.

        You are quite literally telling on yourself here, you seem to have a limited view of AI application and are judging the entire technology/concept based on that narrow set of use-cases (which appear to be, from your comment, chat bots, porn generators, future weather predictors, not exactly the pinnacle of AI application).

        I’m so over AI, please someone notify me when it’s really useful and can take over the menial, tedious tasks

        Here you go again! You seem to be equating value to the ability for the tech to function without supervision or assistance. Does AI only provide value to you if it can do those things completely autonomously? What if working with the AI is faster than not using it at all? Is it still useless to you?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When someone is disappointed in something, the very worst way you can make progress in changing that person’s mind is flatly telling them they’re wrong.

          You didn’t change anything with your reaction here, I still live in the world with useless, annoying AI. Like most people. I won’t now look at it and think “Hmn I should reconsider how I feel” As I try to refine my search results so it doesn’t feed me complete garbage.

          I’m absolutely sure it’s helping some people in specific instances, but we’re not at the point yet where it’s helping people broadly, so I fucking DARE you to say any of this in a larger community where average people with non-coding jobs have to sift through AI bullshit all day.

          I know it’s going to help in the future with a lot of things, but it’s also going to get worse before it gets better, and I’m not some lone voice, so you have to get over yourself here, you’re not anywhere close to the majority of opinion here, even on the tech/singularity/cult forums there are plenty of people fed up with the current state of marketing and AI being shoved into everything. I stand by every last thing I said here. People in your position are deliberately not reading the negative things people feel about this tech in it’s current state, but there are a LOT of people who share this feeling.

          And you know what? You should embrace it.

          Because if people didn’t voice their discontent, it won’t get better. The whinging pushback against criticism just boggles me, like people are so caught up in the cult that they can’t see it as another product that has to be refined and shaped before people can use it and enjoy it in any capacity.

          Several top links from “How do people feel about AI”

          https://www.tomorrowsworldtoday.com/artificial-intelligence/85-of-people-dont-like-ai-but-its-coming-anyway/

          https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/artificial-intelligence-consumer-sentiment/

          https://www.ftc.gov/policy/advocacy-research/tech-at-ftc/2023/10/consumers-are-voicing-concerns-about-ai

          https://hbr.org/2024/05/ais-trust-problem

          And of course, THIS VERY ARTICLE: https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-consumers-turned-off-products-ai