• dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I’ve had periods where I was switching back and forth, but your entire shell having breaking issues on every minor patch is unacceptable. If they’re also going to break other apps with that, i don’t know how i would recommend it

      • @DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        If Linux is to go mainstream I feel like KDE needs to be the default Desktop experience on distros. The Windows-like style is what the majority of people recognize and are familiar with and the KDE developers seems to care a lot about their userbase.

        New users already has a lot to deal with and learn when it comes it Linux. They don’t need their desktop environment to work against them too.

        • dinckel
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          I disagree with this, personally. There’s a lot more to initial usability/discoverability, than Windows-compatible visuals. If anything, when i’ve switched a couple of my family members off Windows, they asked me for something that doesn’t look like it, because they could never navigate through the desktop properly

  • Eugenia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Reading the bug report about all that ( https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288 ), it’s crazy to see how the gnome dev (Red Hat employee) replies to the issue. He completely ignores the issue in the beginning, then that he doesn’t care to follow the spec because it’s “old”, and yet, he still advertises to the OS as an fdo theme, so OSes ship with it. He’s hurting non-gnome apps, and he simply doesn’t seem to care about it. To me, this shows a person who simply doesn’t care about ecosystem.

    • @LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      197 months ago

      I have defended Red Hat a fair bit over the past year. Their level of contribution to the community is a big reason why.

      It is clear though that their prominence comes with a downside in the paternal and authoritative way that their employees present themselves. Design choices and priorities are made with an emphasis on what works for and what is required for Red Hat and the software they are going to ship. The impact on the wider community is not always considered and too often actively dismissed.

      Even some of the Linux centrism perceived in Open Source may really be more about Red Hat. For example, GNOME insists on Systemd. Both projects are dominated by Red Hat. There have been problems with their stewardship of other projects.

      To me, this is a much bigger problem than all the license hand-waving we saw before.

    • @proton_lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      I was getting really pissed seeing that Pointieststick had to explain the same fucking thing OVER AND OVER again. I don’t know if the gnome dev in question is stupid or just trolling.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    247 months ago

    Gnome to Gnome users: Why are they constantly shooting themselves in the foot?

    Gnome to a Xfce (me) or KDE user: hey y’all come quick they’re doing something stupid again

  • Cris
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As someone who much prefers gnome for my desktop this shit is so frustrating. I’m kinda just waiting and watching to see if they ruin another thing I like about it :(

    Its fucking exhausting

  • @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -337 months ago

    More closed and non-customizable systems are much more stable. I guess that’s what GNOME devs are trying to achieve and I don’t really mind it. We have other options for those who need customization. The most used and mainstream one really should be focused on stability. Though I don’t think anyone tried breaking icons before. It’s a bit too much. The app devs will need to make multiple icons for different DEs which is a good thing but shouldn’t be forced like that

    • 56!
      link
      fedilink
      327 months ago

      If stability was their aim, they wouldn’t be breaking stuff all the time…

      • @ijhoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -37 months ago

        I would argue that gnome is pretty stable in recent years. Don’t remember when was the last time something crashed.

        This might would probably be true for Extensions.

        KDE has been unstable for me on Wayland in the past.

    • @MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      I guess that’s what GNOME devs are trying to achieve

      They should strive for something like FLTK then, it has much smaller codebase.

    • @john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      Ahh, the old “it’s too difficult for us.”

      If the gnome devs are so incompetent, why don’t they just get another job?