• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They can’t spend that fucking money on making this shit in a way that’s compliant instead?

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, if data centers used solar power, batteries, and cooling that doesn’t waste water, I think communities wouldn’t mind (as much).

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If I had fucking 280 billion and wanted to build the world’s biggest data center right fucking now, you bet your ass I’d buy out the entire production chain of renewables infrastructure and get fucking even richer for the next 50 years as I use the stuff at the start to make the data center, then the rest to charge the local population for green energy, and to spend the rest of the supply chain after to sell more green energy production stuff.

        • modus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you had 280 billion, you wouldn’t give two hot shits about destroying the world.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    If they want data centers so damn bad we can be sure they will not be good for us.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s $1B+ that could have increased paychecks or benefits or bathroom breaks.

    Holy shit, why would anyone still work there after moves like that?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    White house meeting ended up with a “morally binding” agreement to be more generous to communities/states considering data centers.

    Apparently, its cheaper to spend $1B on “toxic sludge is good for you” lies than it is to offer community benefits.