• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    14 days ago

    Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        The viable alternative is nothing.

        Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don’t even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

        All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

      • Boo! Haunted House!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Facebook to Friendica

        Twitter/Threads to Mastodon/Euclavd

        Instagram to Pixelfed/Vernissage

        Tiktok to Loops

        YouTube to PeerTube

        Anything else?

        Edit:

        Whatsapp to Signal/Delta Chat/Cwtch/Briar

        Reddit to Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Loops

          I wish every content creator would post on both TikTok AND Loops, because Loops could definitely replace TikTok. It has a really solid basis and a lot of potential(although I wish I didn’t have to pause before scrolling off of a video).

          I am really glad to see someone mention Loops, and if I could choose to view someone’s content on Loops instead of TikTok, I would.

          Edit: Oh, and https://loops.video/ if anyone is wondering what we’re talking about.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I stopped using Facebook years ago.

        Before there were viable alternatives.

        The idea that you need Facebook because there aren’t significant alternatives is just not true.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        “Let’s have tacos tonight.” “Nah Im not feeling tacos.” “OK let’s get Chinese food.” “Nah i don’t want Chinese food.” "…ok… let’s make soup. " “Nah I don’t want soup tonight.”

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          This made me thoughtful and laugh at the same time, thank you.

          You’re right, of course. People prefer centralized platforms, and we “nerds” prefer decentralized ones.

          There are no alternatives.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        No alternative is viable if no one uses it.

        The network effect is real, and it’s what lets these fascism pushers stay top of mind at all times.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      And also Instagram and whatever other Zuck products are in your life. I’m happy they wasted so many billions of dollars setting of virtual Mii meetings lmao…

  • undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    14 days ago

    “After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.”

    Wow.

    • redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      not that i’m a meta fan, I fucking hate that company, but this swings both ways. Imagine your local coffee shop is boosting posts about traditional marriage and pro-life themes. They get blocked as well.

      • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I just don’t go to that coffee shop. Problem solved. They can say whatever they want. If I don’t support it I don’t go. I don’t see how the coffee shop argument hold up. And if enough people hold the same views they close.

        Meta however is too big to fail. Which gives them a free pass to pass their cancerous views onto society while knowing no matter how much the general public hates them and their shitty views they will continue to use the platform because their friends and family still use it. Enshittification. If my coffee shop enshittifies I tell them to pound sand.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        There’s no way to get around “any mention of civil rights” though. That covers all humans.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Maybe. This was an advertisement for a book that had those themes.

        Personally, I don’t want either to be excluded.

  • pixiribbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    facebook has become such a sinister platform. i’ve witnessed several members of my family become radicalized by their algorithms pushing conspiratorial rhetoric. the worst part? they refuse to use anything else. there’s just something about facebook that has them convinced it’s reputable.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I see incredibly violent and bigoted content all the time on Meta platforms and always report it. Rarely does anything get taken down. But feminism bad I suppose.

  • ksigley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Lol. Feminism should be the standard. Everything else is simply sexism.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      This is the problem with social media. Outrage drives clicks, so “feminism” is portrayed as a caricature of brightly died hair, “ugly” women, feeble men, and the stereotype of unemployed art students.

      It’s exactly what we were warned about in books like 1984 and animal farm. The media controls thoughts, who controls the media?

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 days ago

    Nobody needs meta. Just stop using any of their products.

    I can’t think of the last time I used Facebook or anything related to it, my life is better for it.

    Just leave them behind.

  • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    So would promoting a play about how great capitalism is get filtered out I wonder?

    I’m fortunate to be of the age where I’ve grown out of Facebook so never bothered to setup Instagram.

    Moving on from WhatsApp is hard though 😡

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    “Women ruin everything” In the olden days it was so much better. Women! Know your place! [edit - this is satire]

    • JelleWho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      There place is right beside anyone else, anyone is just another humon. And most of them already know it, it mostly the other side that does not want to accept this it seems?

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Just in case, my comment was harsh satire. Not the rantings of one of those morons.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is fine under section 230.

    Be careful, we don’t want to get rid of section 230.

    Best thing to do is get as many people off meta sites as possible.