Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Some features are compromised by the requirement to keep this old code, though I’m not qualified to say to what extent.

    “Trust me bro”

    Who’s still using a Cyril 6x86 that isn’t doing it for personal/recreational reasons?

    In your estimation clearly nobody. You’re evading the question of why they should be artificially forced to use outdated software by denying enthusiasts who want to use a kernel built by an enthusiast and then by a bunch of enthusiasts for enthusiasts exist. 🤦‍♂️

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m sorry, but I have a bit more trust in the Linux kernel maintainers on the technicals of this issue than you or I.

      I do know enough to know that a Cyril 6x86 is problematic to use with many modern applications. I find it hard to believe anyone using one needs a modern kernel feature for something, and any other PC is unavailable.

      I mean, at the very least, I think they’d need another PC to build a custom kernel themselves? Can you even build Linux 7.1 on that system now?